<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Draft Letter from GNSO to Board re WHOIS RT Recommendations
- To: "Winterfeldt, Brian" <bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Draft Letter from GNSO to Board re WHOIS RT Recommendations
- From: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 08:11:47 -0700
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- In-reply-to: <49103F566C2B084C830EE035FF986E060136E3943603@SJUSEVS10.steptoe.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <49103F566C2B084C830EE035FF986E060136E3943603@SJUSEVS10.steptoe.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Ac2rYaHBWTHk5HsCS1W3AivtAs16kAATQPcw
- Thread-topic: [council] Draft Letter from GNSO to Board re WHOIS RT Recommendations
Hi Brian-
A couple of observations on the draft letter:
* The response only seems to focus on process, rather than substance.
In other words, it focuses on whether a PDP is required, and not whether the
various Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies agree with or endorse the
recommendations. Is this intentional? The Board is likely to be more
interested in the substantive response, although the procedural one seems to be
the focus of the response.
* With regard to the response to Rec 12 (...that ICANN form a working
group to determine IDN registration data requirements....)
"There were five (5) responsive members of the SG; 80% agreed that a PDP was
not required to implement this recommendation."
Please note that this may need to be revised if the IRD WG Motion on the
Council's agenda tomorrow is passed, because the PDP that would be started
would be addressing this very issue.
Thanks,
Margie
______
Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
_______
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Winterfeldt, Brian
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:47 AM
To: 'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [council] Draft Letter from GNSO to Board re WHOIS RT Recommendations
Dear Councilors,
As was discussed in Saturday's session with regard to the WHOIS RT work,
attached please find a draft letter to the ICANN Board detailing our various
constituencies' recommendations as to whether a PDP would be required for
certain WHOIS enhancements.
We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and look forward to hearing
your views so that we may move forward as soon as possible with providing our
communication to the Board. Thank you.
Best regards,
Brian
Brian J. Winterfeldt
Partner
bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Steptoe
+1 202 429 6260 direct
+1 202 903 4422 mobile
+1 202 429 3902 fax
Steptoe & Johnson LLP - DC
1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
www.steptoe.com<http://www.steptoe.com/>
+1 212.506.3935 direct
+1 212.506.3950 fax
Steptoe & Johnson LLP - New York
1114 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
This message and any attached documents contain information from the law firm
Steptoe & Johnson LLP that may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are
not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, distribute, or use this
information. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the
sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|