<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Consumer Metrics Draft Motion
John,
Following yesterday's presentation and discussion, I am happy to second this
motion.
Thank-you.
Jonathan
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of John Berard
Sent: 10 October 2012 18:56
To: Alan Greenberg
Cc: <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Consumer Metrics Draft Motion
Alan,
Thank you, Alan. The headline ought to better reflect the motion.
Cheers,
Berard
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 10, 2012, at 10:26 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> John, a bit late, but on summarizing the Council Motions for the ALAC, I
noticed that this one is entitled "Motion on the Adoption of a Working Group
on Consumer Trust, Consumer Choice, and Competition (CTCCC)", which sounds
like it is approving the creation of the group instead of approving the
group's work product.
>
> Perhaps:
>
> Motion on the Adoption of the Advice Letter of the Working Group on
Consumer Trust, Consumer Choice, and Competition (CTCCC)
>
> Alan
>
>
>
>
> At 13/09/2012 12:55 PM, john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> All, Here is the motion I intend to offer for consideration in Toronto.
It is short enough and the time long enough that we might even be able to
put it on the consent agenda for the meeting.
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|