<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Fwd: [Soac-infoalert] Community Input and Advice Process Session in Toronto
- To: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Fwd: [Soac-infoalert] Community Input and Advice Process Session in Toronto
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 10:29:28 +0200
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <CC931B7C.20C76%david.olive@icann.org>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
FYI
Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
INDOM NetNames France
----------------
Registry Relations and Strategy Director
NetNames
T: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 51
F: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 61
Début du message réexpédié :
> De : David Olive <david.olive@xxxxxxxxx>
> Objet : Rép : [Soac-infoalert] Community Input and Advice Process Session in
> Toronto
> Date : 4 octobre 2012 17:39:24 HAEC
> À : "soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx" <soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Dear SO-AC Leaders and Colleagues:
>
> While we all are trying to arrange our busy schedules for the ICANN
> meeting in Toronto, I ask for your cooperation to raise awareness about
> this important issue.
>
> This discussion document on this topic was posted for public comment at the
> request of the Board Governance Committee to solicit views from the ICANN
> community on ways to enhance the process by which the Board seeks advice from
> the ICANN community beyond the traditional public comment process. This
> issue stems from the work undertaken in fulfillment of recommendation No. 6
> from the Accountability and Transparency Review Team, and highlights an area
> where improvements can lead to predictability and consistency for future
> Board actions.
>
> The Monday session in Toronto was on the schedule as a first step to draw
> attention to this issue and to start an ongoing discussion. Therefore, I
> would ask your cooperation to share this notice with your groups, even if
> participation in this session may not be possible.
>
> Regards, David
>
> David A. Olive
> Vice President, Policy Development Support
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> 1101 New York Avenue, NW - Suite 930
> Washington, D.C. 20005
> Office: 202.570.7126 Mobile: 202.341.3611
>
>
>
>
> On 4 okt 2012, at 15:02, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Dear SO/AC Leaders,
>>
>> As you may have seen, ICANN Staff posted a document on Community Input and
>> Advice Process for public comment on 24 September (see
>> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/input-advice-function-24sep12-en.htm).
>> In addition, a session has been scheduled in Toronto to discuss this
>> subject (see http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34195). The objective of this
>> public comment forum and the discussion in Toronto is to obtain community
>> input on the process by which the ICANN Board seeks advice from the
>> community on topics that are not subject to formal policy development
>> processes. It is hoped that these discussions could lead to a consistent and
>> predictable process to be adopted by the ICANN Board for such inquiries.
>>
>> For the meeting in Toronto we are putting together an informal panel
>> discussion during which we would like to hear from the different SO/ACs how
>> they currently deal which such requests from the Board and provide their
>> views on the questions that were also outlined in the discussion paper (see
>> http://www.icann.org/en/news/in-focus/accountability/input-advice-function-24sep12-en.pdf):
>> Should standardized processes be created for the Board's receipt of
>> community input and advice?
>> If so, should such a procedure be standardized across ICANN SOs/ACs, aligned
>> with the current existing procedures, or should there be some flexibility
>> among the SOs/ACs (certain parts are required for all, while other parts may
>> be developed by the respective SO/Acs)
>> How should the Board request this input and advice?
>> What is the most effective and efficient method to deal with the issue topic
>> identified? Should it be a working group, could current procedures be used?
>> Who determines which method will be used?
>> Should working groups be chartered for each initiative?
>> How are different parts of the ICANN community expected to work together in
>> these efforts?
>> What minimum public consultation requirements, if any, should be required
>> within this function?
>> Who within ICANN lead this effort?
>> We would like to encourage you and/or members of your SO/AC to attend this
>> session to share your views. If you have any suggestions for panel members,
>> please feel free to share those off-list with me. The session takes place on
>> Monday 15 October from 13.30 – 14.45 local time in room Metro Centre.
>>
>> With best regards,
>>
>> Marika
>>
>> Marika Konings
>> Sr. Policy Director
>> ICANN
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> soac-infoalert mailing list
>> soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/soac-infoalert
>
> _______________________________________________
> soac-infoalert mailing list
> soac-infoalert@xxxxxxxxx
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/soac-infoalert
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|