Re: [council] Fwd: Uniform Rapid Suspension Discussion

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

All, just a minor correction, the URS session is currently scheduled for 
Thursday 18 October from 11.45 – 13.00 local time (see 
http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34325) and not Monday.

Best regards,

Marika

From: Jonathan Robinson 
<jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Monday 1 October 2012 16:47
To: Stéphane Van Gelder 
<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
"council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: [council] Fwd: Uniform Rapid Suspension Discussion

Thanks Stéphane,

I can confirm that the Registries SG has now received a related request from 
ICANN (Olof Nordling) looking for input and agenda items.

In our case, we (the GNSO) are being asked for a presentation or statement on 
the way forward for URS work.
It seems that Olof is looking for something at the Monday meeting.

As far as I can see this topic (URS) only comes up on the weekend as part of 
our composite new gTLD session with the Kurt on Sunday morning.

So, we may need to schedule some dedicated time to deal with this or set Olof’s 
expectations that a statement is unlikely.

I’d be interested to hear from others as to whether or not it’s realistic to 
provide GNSO Council agreed input at the Monday meeting?

Jonathan

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: 29 September 2012 13:14
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> List
Subject: [council] Fwd: Uniform Rapid Suspension Discussion

Councillors, FYI.

Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
INDOM NetNames France
----------------
Registry Relations and Strategy Director
NetNames
T: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 51
F: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 61

Début du message réexpédié :


De : Olof Nordling <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>>
Objet : RE: Uniform Rapid Suspension Discussion
Date : 28 septembre 2012 18:08:48 HAEC
À : 'Stéphane Van Gelder' 
(stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>) 
<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc : Kurt Pritz <kurt.pritz@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:kurt.pritz@xxxxxxxxx>>, Karen 
Lentz <karen.lentz@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:karen.lentz@xxxxxxxxx>>, Amy Stathos 
<amy.stathos@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:amy.stathos@xxxxxxxxx>>


Dear Stéphane,
Kurt forwarded me your kind reply to his mail below, and I would like to 
follow-up with some updates and a specific question. As you may have noted, the 
first upcoming sessions on URS are a webinar on 3 October 
(seehttp://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-6-24sep12-en.htm ) 
and a session in Toronto on 18 October (see 
http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34325), where we will further discuss the 
solution suggestions brought up by the community in Prague and pursue the 
objectives stated in Kurt’s mail.  The ambition is to find an agreed way to 
analyze each suggestion in detail and reach balanced conclusions, for example 
by establishing a suitably balanced drafting team for that purpose.

Now to my question, as you mention that the Council may follow-up on Kurt’s 
message in a near future: Could we count on a presentation or statement at the 
URS session in Toronto to provide GNSO Council guidance on the best way forward 
for the continued URS work?

I hope this is possible and look forward to your response.

On another note: I also intend to contact the GNSO SGs/Constituencies 
individually as their contributions to the discussions in substance are 
essential. In addition, your help in spreading the word to them would be much 
appreciated. Proposals for the Toronto session as to speakers and topics are 
warmly welcome, as well as written input.

Very best regards

Olof


From: Stéphane Van Gelder 
<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>>
To: Kurt <kurt.pritz@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:kurt.pritz@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: Uniform Rapid Suspension Discussion

Thanks Kurt. I am copying the Council for their information.

The Council will no doubt follow-up on this in the near future.

Best,

Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
INDOM NetNames France
----------------
Registry Relations and Strategy Director
NetNames
T: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 51
F: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 61

Le 18 sept. 2012 à 22:09, Kurt Pritz a écrit :



Hi Stephane:

I am writing to let you know that we are planning a set of discussions on 
Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) implementation in the near future and seek the 
input of GNSO leadership. As you know, a meeting in Prague we indicated that 
URS, as currently designed, did not appear to meet cost requirements. In 
Prague, contributors in the meeting described briefly several potential 
solutions. In the next set of meetings, we want to flesh out some of those 
models for possible implementation.We want to have one meeting in about two 
weeks (probably a webinar type of format with a possibility for some 
face-to-face interaction), and then we have a meeting in Toronto is scheduled. 
The first meeting will be announced shortly.

I am writing you because some of the proposed solutions, while feasible, do not 
match up with the specific conclusions of the STI team when it did its work. We 
recognize the role of the GNSO in those discussions. While the meetings we are 
having are open to all, we understand that the GNSO leadership might want to 
conduct the URS discussions in a certain way. Having the twin goals of 
developing a solution in time for use by new gTLDs and ensuring that all those 
interested can participate in the discussion, we can work in whichever way the 
GNSO wishes to proceed. (Of course, we also seek to meet the cost and 
timeliness goals for which the the URS was designed and also seek to ensure 
that registrants enjoy the protections written into the current model by the 
IRT and STI.)The output of the next meetings can inform GNSO discussion or we 
can carry on in a way acceptable to the GNSO.

I am also copying Olivier as ALAC members participated in the STI.

I hope you find this helpful. Contact me anytime with questions.

Regards,

Kurt