<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Action Items arising from the GNSO Council meeting 13 September 2012
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Action Items arising from the GNSO Council meeting 13 September 2012
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:35:55 -0700
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Ac2VJIVijujOi+4aT5uGgi6hiBOM+Q==
- Thread-topic: Action Items arising from the GNSO Council meeting 13 September 2012
Dear Councillors,
Please find the action items arising from the Council meeting on 13 September
2012.
Agenda Item 3: Consent agenda
Action Item: The GNSO Council chair to inform the SSAC chair that the Council
approved that the IRD-WG letter from the GNSO Council to ICANN Board be sent to
the Board.
Item 4: RAP recommendation on Uniformity of Reporting
Action Item: Propose a motion for the next Council meeting in Toronto
requesting an Issue Report with the intent of launching a PDP to address this
issue within the scope and boundaries of the GNSO. (9 October 2012 deadline
for motions and documents to be considered at the GNSO Council Public meeting
in Toronto)
Item 5: Whois Review Team Final Report
Action Item: Brian Winterfeldt is asked to reconvene the group and examine the
two options discussed at the Council meeting and report back to the Council
chair with the time frame so that the ICANN Board can be appropriately and
timely informed.
· Option 1 .A response to the Board advising them to consider what each
individual GNSO constituency and stakeholder group has to say on the Whois
Review team Final Report recommendations.
· Option 2. Tabulate the 16 recommendations, and explain for each one why
there should or should not be policy development. Transmit the detailed
response to the Board. Provide Council with a time frame for this option which
the chair can communicate to the Board
Item 6: Fake Renewal Notices
Action Item: Mason Cole is to request that the Registrars continue with the
steps suggested below:
· Discuss the issue with ICANN Compliance to make SG and GNSO concerns
known, as previous legal actions may impact renewal of offenders' accreditation
agreements.
· 2. Communicate to jurisdictional authorities as a SG to make our
concerns known and to assess renewed enforcement - especially authorities like
the FTC and the Canadian consumer agency that have already brought cases and
may have stronger enforcement tools (e.g., civil penalties for violations of
settlement agreements, etc.) that can be used. In particular, it may make sense
to schedule a discussion with interested consumer protection authorities in
Toronto.
· 3. Report findings to the GNSO Council.
· 4. Investigate whether or not enforceable contract language can be
crafted, and the extent to which it could be equally or more effective than
enforcement actions to date. For example, rather than requiring ICANN to make a
determination about the behavior, a contractual provision that says
accreditation can be revoked where a registrar has been found to be in
violation of a court order or regulatory cease and desist order.
Item 8: Impact of new gTLDs on ICANN's structure
Action Item: Send updated draft response to the Council list for further
comments.
All comments should be submitted by the end of next week (Friday 21 September
2012). The chair will then seek agreement on the Council mailing list whether
the draft response be sent to Bertrand de la Chapelle.
Item 9: Overview of schedule for Toronto
Action Item: Please provide Topics for discussion with the GAC, Board and ccNSO.
Please provide your input to the Council mailing list as soon as possible
Item 10: Toronto GAC High Level Meeting
Action Item: Provide input on the Council list with regard to:
"I would recommend preparation of Qs and lining up speakers in advance. I
trust that the GNSO leadership will work with the GAC, as well as my Canadian
colleagues, to find a balance between the differing cultures of the GNSO, and
senior officials and politicians unfamiliar with the ICANN environment, to have
a positive and productive exchange to reinforce and improve the
multi-stakeholder model."
Item11: Consumer Metrics Advice Letter to the ICANN Board
Action Item: Motion to be proposed for the GNSO Council Public meeting in
Toronto on 17 October 2012. (9 October 2012 deadline for motions and documents
to be considered at the GNSO Council Public meeting in Toronto)
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|