<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Re: Update from The New gTLD Program Committee on the Red Cross/Red Crescent and IOC Issues
- To: Cherine Chalaby <cherine.chalaby@xxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx List" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Re: Update from The New gTLD Program Committee on the Red Cross/Red Crescent and IOC Issues
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:53:54 +0200
- Cc: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>, New gTLD Program Committee <board-gtlds@xxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <CC78D446.19709%cherine.chalaby@icann.org>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <CC78D446.19709%cherine.chalaby@icann.org>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks Cherine,
I am copying the Council for their information.
Best,
Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
INDOM NetNames France
----------------
Registry Relations and Strategy Director
NetNames
T: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 51
F: +22 (0)1 48 01 83 61
Le 14 sept. 2012 à 21:32, Cherine Chalaby a écrit :
> Dear Stéphane,
> I wanted to reach out to you and the GNSO Council to let you know about an
> issue of interest to the GNSO that the New gTLD Program Committee addressed
> this week: the protection of Red Cross/Red Crescent and IOC names. The
> Committee passed a resolution yesterday requesting that the GNSO consider a
> proposed solution for the first round to protect at the second level the
> names of Red Cross/Red Crescent and IOC, consistent with the GAC advice to
> the Board.
> We have been apprised of, and appreciate, the significant work currently
> underway by the GNSO’s IOC/RC Drafting Team, and the potential PDP under
> consideration. We crafted the resolution in a way that recognises that GNSO
> work is ongoing. The resolution and the rationale will be posted next Monday.
> The Committee adopted this resolution now, rather than wait until Toronto, to
> provide sufficient time for the GNSO to develop its views on this request
> taking into account the timeline for the first round. It is important that
> this issue is resolved early next year so that additional protections, if
> they are adopted, are in place for the first round. As a result, the
> Committee is seeking the GNSO’s response by January 31, 2013.
> We look forward to receiving the GNSO's response and are available to discuss
> this issue in further detail in Toronto.
> Sincerely,
> Cherine Chalaby
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|