<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Re: hi Stéphane
- To: Vanda UOL <vanda@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Re: hi Stéphane
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 00:04:44 +0200
- Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John Jeffrey <john.jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <006d01cd719e$ace3bcb0$06ab3610$@uol.com.br>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <006d01cd719e$ace3bcb0$06ab3610$@uol.com.br>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Vanda,
Please see below a copy of the email sent by the ICANN general Counsel at the
time, giving his (very clear) assessment of the situation. I hope this can
help. I am copying the Council so everyone is aware of the ongoing discussions
between you and I on this and the fact that we are working to resolve this
issue.
Thanks,
Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
INDOM Group NBT France
----------------
Head of Domain Operations
Group NBT
JJ's email:
>> From: John Jeffrey <john.jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Fwd: formal position requirement
>> Date: October 19, 2011 9:19:12 AM PDT
>> To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, Adam Peake
>> <ajp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Samantha Eisner <Samantha.Eisner@xxxxxxxxx>, Robert Hoggarth
>> <robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>, Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>, Daniel
>> Halloran <daniel.halloran@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Bcc: John Jeffrey <john.jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Dear Stephane and Adam,
>>
>> I write to you jointly as Chairs of the GNSO and the NomCom. I received the
>> attached note from Carlos Dionisio Aguirre regarding the NomCom appointees
>> to the GNSO and noted the need to provide advice on the ICANN Bylaws.
>>
>> Article X, Section 3.e requires the NomCom to appoint three members of the
>> GNSO Council. Of those appointees, one shall be non-voting, and “one voting
>> representative shall be assigned to each House . . . by the Nominating
>> Committee.” This Bylaws provision requires the NomCom to assign voting
>> representatives among the GNSO’s contracted and non-contracted party houses.
>> Pursuant to the Bylaws, this assignment work should not be left to the GNSO.
>>
>> I appreciate that with the GNSO Restructuring, the initial assignment of the
>> single NomCom Appointee (NCA) selected by the NomCom in 2010 did not pose a
>> lot of complexity. However, now that the restructured form of the GNSO
>> Council is in place and the NomCom is making appointments for multiple NCAs,
>> it is important for the NomCom to complete the assignment process and
>> identify the roles of the NCAs to the GNSO. If possible, I encourage the
>> NomCom to complete this assignment process prior to the ICANN AGM in Dakar,
>> Senegal and the seating of the new GNSO Council members (28 October 2011).
>>
>> Due to the NomCom’s appointment rotation (2 NCAs to the GNSO in odd years, 1
>> NCA in even years), it may be beneficial for the NomCom and GNSO to consult
>> together to determine if the GNSO would be better served by having both
>> voting NCAs rotate at the same time, or if it is preferable to have 1 voting
>> and 1 non-voting NCA rotate at the same time, with the term of the other
>> voting NCA rotating in even years. Further, as the NomCom and the GNSO
>> continue dialogue on identifying skill sets for the NCAs to the GNSO, skills
>> desirable for each role (Non-Contracted House NCA, Contracted House NCA and
>> Non-Voting NCA) could be identified for NomCom consideration.
>>
>> I look forward to seeing you in Dakar. If you have any questions, or we can
>> be of assistance to you, please let us know.
>>
>> John Jeffrey
>> General Counsel & Secretary
>> ICANN
>> JJ@xxxxxxxxx
Le 3 août 2012 à 19:37, Vanda UOL <vanda@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> Dear Stéphane
> We start again, as I said, debating inside the Committee and since our notes
> are not recorded, we have the best the staff get from the points discussed
> inside our meetings/calls.
> My personal recollection is that we just debated and no final decision was
> taken related to placing of the appointee within the GNSO structure.
> By the other hand, we do deal with the position open for the GNSO this year
> as a non-voting position during the selection process, as all Committee
> members have stated when you first asked. However, this does not mean the
> candidate does not fit for a vote position.
> Do you have any transcription of the meeting we had with GNSO about the
> issue, to share with NomComm members?
>
> If you have and can share, will certainly help.
> Thank you in advance,
>
>
> Vanda Scartezini
> ICANN Nominating Committee
> Chair 2012
> Tel + 5511 3266.6253
> Mob + 55118181.1464
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|