Re: [council] Action items from Prague / GNSO Review

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

This already features as a discussion item for the next meeting. If Councillors 
wish to pursue this discussion on the list before then, please do so.

Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
INDOM Group NBT France
----------------
Registry Relations and Strategy Director
Group NBT

Le 6 juil. 2012 à 19:18, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :

> 
> I strongly believe it is way to early for a review.  Let's reserve this 
> subject for a discussion on the next Council call before setting up the group.
> 
> 
> 
> Sent with Good (www.good.com)
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:         Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 12:41 PM Eastern Standard Time
> To:   Winterfeldt, Brian
> Cc:   Wendy Seltzer; GNSO Council List
> Subject:      Re: [council] Action items from Prague / GNSO Review
> 
> 
> Is there support from others for the creation of a group?
> 
> I would think that the group would need to be formalised as a DT, with a 
> charter. Although you may wish to bring the review forward Wendy, others 
> clearly feel we should be doing exactly the opposite. With such strong 
> divergence of views, we must ensure that the mechanism we use to discuss this 
> issue is unambiguous and accountable.
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> Envoyé de mon iPhone4
> 
> Le 6 juil. 2012 à 16:26, "Winterfeldt, Brian" <bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx> a 
> écrit :
> 
>> I am happy to join Wendy as apart of the small group as well.
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Brian
>> 
>> Brian J. Winterfeldt  
>> Partner 
>> bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Steptoe
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
>> Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer
>> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 6:34 AM
>> To: Stéphane Van Gelder
>> Cc: GNSO Council List
>> Subject: Re: [council] Action items from Prague / GNSO Review
>> 
>> 
>> On 07/01/2012 07:00 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
>> 
>>> GNSO Review
>>> We have discussed two possible alternatives: drafting a request to the SIC 
>>> to delay the review and creating a small group to look at this issue. What 
>>> do we want to do?
>> 
>> I volunteer to be part of a small group discussing the review.  I favor
>> *advancing* rather than delaying the review, as well as helping the SIC to 
>> frame it to address the challenges and barriers to consensus-building that 
>> stem from our current siloed structure.
>> 
>> --Wendy
>> 
>> --
>> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx +1 617.863.0613 Fellow, Yale Law School 
>> Information Society Project Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at 
>> Harvard University http://wendy.seltzer.org/ 
>> https://www.chillingeffects.org/ https://www.torproject.org/ 
>> http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
>