Re: [council] Action items from Prague

[William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxx>]

Hi Stéphane 

Sorry to confuse with my pidgin English, typing fast.  My "would benefit ICANN 
generally, not just GNSO, although this would probably require reinstating at 
least Friday morning " was meant to convey that doing something ICANN-wide, and 
not just in the GNSO, would probably require reinstating at least Friday 
morning.   

That said, Jeff is of course right that if we slip in some free form dialogue 
at the front end then we'd have to economize on time elsewhere, and Wendy is 
right that slimming or skipping the reports could be a way of doing that, 
although perhaps that wouldn't be a universal preference…

Bill


On Jul 5, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:

> Thanks Bill. I don't understand why you suggest that Fridays would need to be 
> reinstated for us to be able to start our work weekend with an informal 
> discussion session.
> 
> Could you please elaborate?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stéphane Van Gelder
> Directeur Général / General manager
> INDOM Group NBT France
> ----------------
> Registry Relations and Strategy Director
> Group NBT
> 
> Le 5 juil. 2012 à 07:24, William Drake a écrit :
> 
>> On Jul 1, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
>> 
>>> Wrap-up and brain storming discussion
>>> Do we want to start the ICANN meeting week with a similar, open ended 
>>> discussion, as the one we have during the wrap-up on Thursday?
>> 
>> As mentioned I think the insertion of some Barcamp/unconference-like time 
>> into the agenda would benefit ICANN generally, not just GNSO, although this 
>> would probably require reinstating at least Friday morning to allow the 
>> regular meetings to get done.  In the meanwhile though, yes starting the 
>> Council's week this way would be refreshing.
>> 
>> Bill
>