<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] ALAC statement on the approval of the .com agreement
There is indeed more than a passing similarity
between the two. And deliberately so. I hope you
don't object to the two groups agreeing on something.
Alan
At 28/06/2012 08:22 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Isn't that our statement Alan?
Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
INDOM Group NBT France
----------------
Head of Domain Operations
Group NBT
Le 28 juin 2012 à 12:40, Alan Greenberg a écrit :
>
> The statement now approved by ALAC is as follows:
>
>
> The At-Large Advisory Committee wishes to
express its disappointment with the Board's
decision to meet in a closed session on
Saturday 23 June to adopt the draft .com
renewal agreement:
http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-23jun12-en.htm#2.
>
> ICANN staff had placed this topic on the
Thursday 28 June public forum agenda some time
ago, and the .com renewal item remains on the
public forum topic list. Although we were
aware that the .com agreement was on the
Board's agenda, we were not aware of the intent
to approve the agreement at its closed session.
>
> This comment is not with regard to the merits
of the Board's action nor on the content of the
.com agreement. The process followed by the
Board is objectionable at a time when ICANN is
subject to increased scrutiny. To give the
impression that the Board is interested in
additional community comment but then make a
decision five days earlier is not appropriate.
It is imperative that the Board hold itself to
the highest standards of transparency and
accountability that it is mandated to uphold.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|