Re: [council] Updated Agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting 7 June 2012 at 20:00 UTC

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Jonathan.

Stéphane



Le 7 juin 2012 à 17:59, Jonathan Robinson a écrit :

> All,
>  
> A minor rework of the text.  I trust that it is considered helpful but not 
> sufficiently material in nature to derail the item from remaining on the 
> consent agenda.
>  
> Best wishes,
>  
>  
> Jonathan
>  
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: 07 June 2012 11:08
> To: William Drake
> Cc: GNSO Council List
> Subject: Re: [council] Updated Agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting 7 June 
> 2012 at 20:00 UTC
>  
> *rant warning*
>  
> Bill, it would be nice if people just made a small effort to read the stuff 
> that's posted to this list!
>  
> After the last Council meeting, I followed-up with a note to the Council 
> listing the action items. One of them was this. I drafted an initial proposal 
> and sent it to the Council list. There was a very small number of comments 
> and then nothing.
>  
> Understanding that everyone is very busy, and not wishing for anyone to be 
> blindsided by this, I went to the trouble of sending a reminder to the 
> Council on June 4. In that reminder, I had wrote the following:
>  
> On the IOC/RC, I have not seen any further comments following the initial 
> draft message that Thomas had sent to the Council list, of which I attach a 
> copy to this message for reference. As such, this item will be considered as 
> part of our consent agenda for the June 7 meeting. I will be asking the 
> Council to approve me sending the note (as drafted by Thomas or as amended 
> during the June 7 teleconference if there are some comments made then) to the 
> GAC.
>  
> And I attached the draft once again to that email (attached here once again 
> for reference)!
>  
> I'm sure therefore that you can understand my frustration, at seeing you now 
> imply that the letter has not been seen before and that this has not been 
> discussed before. That's just the situation I was trying to avoid: us getting 
> to the consent agenda without having first discussed and agreed something.
>  
> We are all very busy. My job as Chair is to try and move us forward on some 
> of the live projects we have on. Please help me do that.
>  
> Thanks,
> <IOC RC GAC Letter draft.docx>