<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Fwd: [board-gtlds] Digital Archery, Batching, Root Scalability,Early Warning and GAC Advice/Objections
- To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Fwd: [board-gtlds] Digital Archery, Batching, Root Scalability,Early Warning and GAC Advice/Objections
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:58:07 +0200
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <4957A389A865044DAC0545D93A57B80C01CE43E3@MSG-MB-02.icent.ic.gc.ca>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Councillors, FYI.
Stéphane
Début du message réexpédié :
> De : <Heather.Dryden@xxxxxxxx>
> Objet : FW: [board-gtlds] Digital Archery, Batching, Root Scalability,Early
> Warning and GAC Advice/Objections
> Date : 7 juin 2012 19:13:34 HAEC
> À : <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, <lesley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ocl@xxxxxxx>,
> <paf@xxxxxxxxx>, <jcurran@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc : <maria.hall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <alice@xxxxxxx>,
> <LIM_Choon_Sai@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> For your information.
>
> (and apologies if I have missed anyone)
>
> From: board-gtlds-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:board-gtlds-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Heather.Dryden@xxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2012 12:32 AM
> To: board-gtlds@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: jeannie.ellers@xxxxxxxxx; kurt.pritz@xxxxxxxxx; jamie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx;
> gac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [board-gtlds] Digital Archery, Batching, Root Scalability,Early
> Warning and GAC Advice/Objections
>
> Dear Cherine, gTLD Committee colleagues,
>
> (cc GAC)
>
> At this time, I would like to provide the following comments on behalf of the
> GAC.
>
> The GAC believes it is important to address the concerns raised by the GAC
> and others about the fairness of Digital Archery, before it is launched.
>
> The GAC further understands that the Board gTLD Committee intends to
> communicate next steps for providing further information to the GAC and
> identifying where there are linkages between Digital Archery, Batching, Root
> Scalability, Early Warning and GAC Advice/Objections so that there can be
> agreement reached, where appropriate, on the process and timelines. In
> essence, the GAC needs further information about ICANN’s approach in order to
> finalise its own processes.
>
> Lastly, please be informed that the GAC intends to send a letter of advice
> before the meeting in Prague, related to the above.
>
> Best,
> Heather Dryden
> Chair, Governmental Advisory Committee
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|