Re: [council] Minimum and average duration of a GNSO PDP
- To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Minimum and average duration of a GNSO PDP
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 09:42:16 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CBE3D63F.2B022firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <CBE3D63F.2B022email@example.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for this Marika.
I think the minimum timetable presumes there will always be a council
meeting at exactly the time that we need one. Since I can recall only
one "special" Council meeting in my almost 6 years (on the RC/IOC), I
suspect this is unrealistic. Assuming a 4-week Council meeting cycle,
that adds about 6 weeks to the total.
It also presumes no time for SGs to consult which is perhaps not
unreasonable for a no-brainer PDP.
At 24/05/2012 06:12 AM, Marika Konings wrote:
Following requests during the last Council meeting, please find
attached a timeline in which I've tried to outline the absolute
minimum as well as the expected average timeline for a GNSO PDP to
go from a request for an Issue Report to Board adoption. Please note
that there are several assumptions included in the timetable in
relation to the absolute minimum. Amongst others, in addition to the
availability of staff and community resources, it assumes that the
PDP concerns a narrowly defined issue with a high level of community
consensus around the recommendations at an early stage of the
process. As a reference, you also find attached an updated version
of the GNSO PDP Timelines which tracks the duration of recent and ongoing PDPs.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
With best regards,
Sr. Policy Director