ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Motion to delay thick WHOIS PDP

  • To: Yoav Keren <yoav@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Motion to delay thick WHOIS PDP
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <Stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:29:56 +0200
  • Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <98166F6C25B4A4458AC6DA8F83CFF2D63713EFE8@exchange03.domain.local>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <F593E70C-DD92-468A-8FFD-EB8E9F69032C@indom.com> <98166F6C25B4A4458AC6DA8F83CFF2D63713EFE8@exchange03.domain.local>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thanks Yoav.

Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
INDOM Group NBT France
----------------
Head of Domain Operations
Group NBT

Le 4 avr. 2012 à 15:57, Yoav Keren a écrit :

> Dear all,
>  
> I second Stephane's motion to administratively allow the process to move 
> forward.
>  
> Best regards,
>  
> Yoav
>  
>  
>  
> Yoav Keren 
> CEO 
> Domain The Net Technologies Ltd.
> 81 Sokolov st.         Tel: +972-3-7600500
> Ramat Hasharon     Fax: +972-3-7600505
> Israel 47238
> <image001.jpg>
>  
>  
>  
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of St?phane Van Gelder
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 4:22 PM
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO
> Subject: [council] Motion to delay thick WHOIS PDP
>  
> All,
>  
> You will remember that in CR the Council expressed a desire to delay the 
> thick whois PDP.
>  
> Since then, the Council leadership and Staff have discussed this at length.
>  
> First, it has been deemed necessary to have a formal motion to do this. Due 
> to the deadline for motions being today, I have asked that a motion to that 
> effect be prepared and I am submitting this today. I am doing this as Chair, 
> from an administrative point of view, to help see this process moved forward.
>  
> Second, we've had extensive discussions on what voting threshold should be 
> used for this motion. In the end, we have ascertained that as there is no 
> specific reference to a PDP suspension process in the bylaws, the default 
> threshold should be used (see bylaws section 3.9: 
> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#X-3.9).
>  
> Motion attached.
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
> viruses.
> ************************************************************************************
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
> viruses.
> ************************************************************************************



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>