ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] How to handle requests for motion deferrals

  • To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] How to handle requests for motion deferrals
  • From: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:23:32 -0600
  • Cc: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <4CAB3015-BFDD-4F6A-BACA-3CF5B12127B0@indom.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <4CAB3015-BFDD-4F6A-BACA-3CF5B12127B0@indom.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I hope the SCI can also look at the historical use of deferrals, i.e. who when 
why, so as to better define the problem & solutions.

Thanks,

Bill

On Mar 15, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:

> 
> Wolf,
> 
> I am writing to you as Chair of the Standing Committee on Improvement 
> Implementation (SCI) to request that you direct the SCI to look at the issue 
> of GNSO Council deferral requests for motions.
> 
> As you know, we have at Council level a practice of allowing referral 
> requests for a motion that is being considered for the first time. I would 
> ask that the SCI examine how this practice could be formalized and inserted 
> in our Rules and Procedures.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> 
> 
>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>