ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] FW: Staff Proposals - IRTP Part B Recommendation #8 and #9 part 2

  • To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] FW: Staff Proposals - IRTP Part B Recommendation #8 and #9 part 2
  • From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:36:48 -0800
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • In-reply-to: <49103F566C2B084C830EE035FF986E060130615A830C@SJUSEVS10.steptoe.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AczPe2FOlgh9zhT2QqOtku2xxe+dRQ==
  • Thread-topic: Staff Proposals - IRTP Part B Recommendation #8 and #9 part 2
  • User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121

Dear All,

Please find attached the comments from the IPC on the staff proposals in 
relation to IRTP Part B Recommendation #8 and #9 part 2. As these comments were 
received after the closing of the public comment forum and the submission of 
the proposals to the Council, these are provided to you directly for your 
consideration. ICANN Staff is planning to provide its feedback on the IPC 
comments separately so that you have the opportunity to review our opinion on 
these comments also as part of your deliberations.

With best regards,

Marika

From: "Winterfeldt, Brian" 
<bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 18:02:12 -0800
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: "Murray, Emily" <emurray@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:emurray@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, "Barry, 
Korey" <Kbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Kbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: Staff Proposals - IRTP Part B Recommendation #8 and #9 part 2

Dear Marika,
Thank you very much for your response. Please find attached the IPC’s comments 
on the above-mentioned issues, which have now been approved by the IPC.  We 
would greatly appreciate it if the comments could be considered and if the 
proposals could be revised, if warranted.

We sincerely appreciate your flexibility and consideration during the busy 
year-end and holiday period.

Best regards,
Brian

Brian J. Winterfeldt, Esq.
Steptoe & Johnson LLP


From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: January 4, 2012 3:43:52 AM EST
To: "Winterfeldt, Brian" 
<bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: Staff Proposals - IRTP Part B Recommendation #8 and #9 part 2
Dear Brian,

As the proposals have already been submitted to the GNSO Council and the public 
comment forum has been closed, it might make more sense to raise the IPC's 
comments as part of the Council's deliberations on the proposals, unless the 
Council prefers that Staff considers the IPC comments first and revises the 
proposals, if necessary, based on the comments.

Best regards,

Marika

From: "Winterfeldt, Brian" 
<bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:56:37 -0800
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: Staff Proposals - IRTP Part B Recommendation #8 and #9 part 2

Dear Marika,

I hope you enjoyed the holiday break!  Unfortunately due to everyone's hectic 
schedule surrounding the holidays, we were a bit delayed in composing comments 
on both of these recommendations on behalf of the IPC.  Accordingly, we are 
planning to submit comments on behalf of the IPC later this week on these 
issues.  Please let us know if that is okay, or if we are too late to do so.

Thank you and looking forward to working together in 2012!

Best,

Brian

Brian J. Winterfeldt, Esq.
Steptoe & Johnson LLP


From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 6:45 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Staff Proposals - IRTP Part B Recommendation #8 and #9 part 2

Dear All,

First of all, best wishes for 2012!

As you may recall, the GNSO Council resolved in June of last year in relation 
to two of the IRTP Part B recommendations (recommendation #8 concerning the 
standardization and clarification of Whois status messages regarding Registrar 
Lock status and recommendation #9 part 2 concerning a new provision to lock and 
unlock domain names) to request ICANN staff to provide proposals. In 
consultation with the IRTP Part B Working Group, ICANN Staff prepared these 
proposals which were subsequently put out for public comment (see 
http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-22nov11-en.htm). As no 
comments were received as part of the public comment forum, these proposals are 
now submitted to the GNSO Council for its consideration (see attached).

If you have any questions, please let me know.

With best regards,

Marika

Attachment: IPC Comments on IRTP Part B Staff Proposals No 8 No 9 Part 2.doc
Description: IPC Comments on IRTP Part B Staff Proposals No 8 No 9 Part 2.doc



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>