ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Staff Proposals - IRTP Part B Recommendation #8 and #9 part 2

  • To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Staff Proposals - IRTP Part B Recommendation #8 and #9 part 2
  • From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 03:45:20 -0800
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AczKDVMe3TSGqPK4ShWWB8zBm8rdiQ==
  • Thread-topic: Staff Proposals - IRTP Part B Recommendation #8 and #9 part 2
  • User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121

Dear All,

First of all, best wishes for 2012!

As you may recall, the GNSO Council resolved in June of last year in relation 
to two of the IRTP Part B recommendations (recommendation #8 concerning the 
standardization and clarification of Whois status messages regarding Registrar 
Lock status and recommendation #9 part 2 concerning a new provision to lock and 
unlock domain names) to request ICANN staff to provide proposals. In 
consultation with the IRTP Part B Working Group, ICANN Staff prepared these 
proposals which were subsequently put out for public comment (see 
http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-22nov11-en.htm). As no 
comments were received as part of the public comment forum, these proposals are 
now submitted to the GNSO Council for its consideration (see attached).

If you have any questions, please let me know.

With best regards,

Marika

Attachment: IRTP Recommendation #9 Part 2 - Proposal from ICANN Staff - 22 November 2011.pdf
Description: IRTP Recommendation #9 Part 2 - Proposal from ICANN Staff - 22 November 2011.pdf

Attachment: IRTP Recommendation #8 - Proposal from ICANN Staff - 22 November 2011.pdf
Description: IRTP Recommendation #8 - Proposal from ICANN Staff - 22 November 2011.pdf



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>