Re: [council] Transition of existing PDPs to new GNSO PDP

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Marika.

Councillors, is there any objection to us instructing each team to transition 
at the next logical step proposed by Marika?

Thanks,

Stéphane



Le 19 déc. 2011 à 11:48, Marika Konings a écrit :

> Dear All,
> 
> As discussed on the Council meeting last week, please find below an overview 
> of the different Policy Development Processes ongoing and the logical next 
> step in their transition to the new PDP. As a reference, you'll also find 
> attached the overview presented during the meeting which provides further 
> details on each of these next steps. If you have any questions, please let me 
> know.
> 
> With best regards,
> 
> Marika
> 
> =================
> 
> Ongoing GNSO PDPs
> Issue Report on the current state of all rights protection mechanisms 
> implemented for both existing and new gTLDs, including but not limited to, 
> the UDRP and URS (to be delivered no later than eighteen (18) months 
> following the delegation of the first new gTLD) - Development of Preliminary 
> Issue Report
> Uniformity of Contracts – Publication of Preliminary Issue Report for public 
> comment
> Law Enforcement Recommendations (currently on hold) - Publication of 
> Preliminary issue Report for public comment
> 'Thick' Whois – Delivery of Final Issue Report to the GNSO Council following 
> the closing of the public comment period
> RAA – Delivery of Final Issue Report to the GNSO Council following the 
> closing of the public comment period
> UDRP (The Requirement to lock a domain name subject to UDRP Proceedings) - 
> Formation of a group to draft the charter for the PDP Working Group. The 
> Council should indicate the timeframe within which a draft PDP Charter is 
> expected to be presented to the GNSO Council for approval. 
> IRTP Part C – Development of Initial Report, including the elements outlined 
> in the PDP Manual
> <PDP Comparison - 14 December 2011.pdf>