<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part C Policy Development Process
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part C Policy Development Process
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:44:09 -0800
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcyonxS0dqbIwToBQDmxEXpQf0v7LQ==
- Thread-topic: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part C Policy Development Process
http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-21nov11-en.htm
Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part C Policy Development Process Comment
Period Deadlines (*)
Important Information Links Public Comment
Box<http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/irtp-c-charter-21nov11-en.htm>
Open Date: 21 November 2011 To Submit Your Comments
(Forum)<mailto:irtp-c-charter@xxxxxxxxx>
Close Date: 22 December 2011 Time (UTC): 23:59
View Comments Submitted<http://forum.icann.org/lists/irtp-c-charter/>
Section I: Description, Explanation, and Purpose
The Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part C Policy Development Process Working
Group is requesting your input on its Charter Questions to help inform its
deliberations. The Charter Questions are:
* "Change of Control" function, including an investigation of how this
function is currently achieved, if there are any applicable models in the
country-code name space that can be used as a best practice for the gTLD space,
and any associated security concerns. It should also include a review of
locking procedures, as described in Reasons for Denial #8 and #9, with an aim
to balance legitimate transfer activity and security.
* Whether provisions on time-limiting Form Of Authorization (FOA)s should be
implemented to avoid fraudulent transfers out. For example, if a Gaining
Registrar sends and receives an FOA back from a transfer contact, but the name
is locked, the registrar may hold the FOA pending adjustment to the domain name
status, during which time the registrant or other registration information may
have changed.
* Whether the process could be streamlined by a requirement that registries
use IANA IDs for registrars rather than proprietary IDs.
For further information on these Charter Questions, please review the IRTP Part
C Final Issue Report (see
http://gnso.icann.org/issues/issue-report-irtp-c-29aug11-en.pdf [PDF, 625 KB]).
In addition, the Working Group has identified the following specific issues /
questions it would like to receive further input on:
* In relation to charter question a), the Issue Report notes that 'data on
the frequency of hijacking cases is a pivotal part of this analysis. Mechanisms
should be explored to develop accurate data around this issue in a way that
meets the needs of registrars to protect proprietary information while at the
same time providing a solid foundation for data-based policy making. Data on
legitimate transfer activity benefitting from the current locking policy
wording needs to be collected'.
* In addition to the ccTLDs described in the Issue Report that do have a
procedure or process for a 'change of control' (.ie, .eu and .uk) are there any
other ccTLDs that have similar procedures or processes which the WG should
review in the context of charter question a)? Furthermore, the WG would be
interested to receive feedback on the experiences with these or other ccTLD
procedures or processes for a 'change of control' as well as identifying
potential benefits and/or possible negative consequences from applying similar
approaches in a gTLD context.
* In relation to charter question b) and c), the WG would be interested in
further input or data in relation to the incidence of this issue to determine
its scope and the most appropriate way to address it.
Section II: Background
The aim of the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) is to provide a
straightforward procedure for domain name holders to transfer their names from
one ICANN-accredited registrar to another. The GNSO Council is reviewing and
considering revisions to this policy through a series of Working Groups it has
established to conduct these efforts. The IRTP Part C Policy Development
Process has just begun and the Working Group formed is requesting your input to
help inform its deliberations, as required by the ICANN Bylaws.
Section III: Document and Resource Links
IRTP Part C Final Issue Report:
http://gnso.icann.org/issues/issue-report-irtp-c-29aug11-en.pdf [PDF, 625 KB]
Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy: http://www.icann.org/en/transfers/
Section IV: Additional Information None Staff Contact: Marika Konings Email:
policy-staff@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:policy-staff@xxxxxxxxx?subject=More%20information%20on%20the%20Inter-Registrar%20Transfer%20Policy%20Part%20C%20Policy%20Development%20Process%20public%20comment%20period>
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|