ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Applicant Guidebook Module 3.1: GAC Advice on New gTLDs

  • To: "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Applicant Guidebook Module 3.1: GAC Advice on New gTLDs
  • From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 01:57:08 +1000
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcyVij7oTW6jPykZSNKUq+2Ore0kVQ==
  • Thread-topic: Applicant Guidebook Module 3.1: GAC Advice on New gTLDs

Annex 1 of the GAC Communiqué:


Applicant Guidebook Module 3.1: GAC Advice on New gTLDs

ICANN's Governmental Advisory Committee was formed to consider and provide 
advice on the activities of ICANN as they relate to concerns of governments, 
particularly matters where there may be an interaction between ICANN's policies 
and various laws and international agreements or where they may affect public 
policy issues.

The process for GAC Advice on new gTLDs is intended to address applications 
that are identified by governments to be problematic, e.g., that potentially 
violate national law or raise sensitivities.

GAC members can raise concerns about any application to the GAC. The GAC as a 
whole will consider concerns raised by GAC members, and agree on GAC advice to 
forward to the ICANN Board of Directors.

The GAC can provide advice on any application. For the Board to be able to 
consider the GAC advice during the evaluation process, the GAC advice would 
have to be submitted by the close of the Objection Filing Period (see Module 1).

GAC Advice may take one of the following forms:

l. The GAC advises ICANN that it is the consensus of the GAC that a particular 
application should not proceed. This will create a strong presumption for the 
ICANN Board that the application should not be approved.

ll. The GAC advises ICANN that there are concerns about a particular 
application "dot-example". The ICANN Board is expected to enter into dialogue 
with the GAC to understand the scope of concerns. The ICANN Board is also 
expected to provide a rationale for its decision.

lll. The GAC advises ICANN that a particular application should not proceed 
unless remediated. This will raise a strong presumption for the Board that the 
application should not proceed unless there is a remediation method available 
in the Guidebook (such as securing one or more government's approval) that is 
implemented by the applicant.


Annex II

Operating Principles Article XII Principle 47

The GAC works on the basis of seeking consensus among its membership. 
Consistent with United Nations practice1, consensus is understood to mean the 
practice of adopting decisions by general agreement in the absence of any 
formal objection. Where consensus is not possible, the Chair shall convey the 
full range of views expressed by members to the ICANN Board.





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>