<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Applicant Guidebook Module 3.1: GAC Advice on New gTLDs
- To: "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Applicant Guidebook Module 3.1: GAC Advice on New gTLDs
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 01:57:08 +1000
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcyVij7oTW6jPykZSNKUq+2Ore0kVQ==
- Thread-topic: Applicant Guidebook Module 3.1: GAC Advice on New gTLDs
Annex 1 of the GAC Communiqué:
Applicant Guidebook Module 3.1: GAC Advice on New gTLDs
ICANN's Governmental Advisory Committee was formed to consider and provide
advice on the activities of ICANN as they relate to concerns of governments,
particularly matters where there may be an interaction between ICANN's policies
and various laws and international agreements or where they may affect public
policy issues.
The process for GAC Advice on new gTLDs is intended to address applications
that are identified by governments to be problematic, e.g., that potentially
violate national law or raise sensitivities.
GAC members can raise concerns about any application to the GAC. The GAC as a
whole will consider concerns raised by GAC members, and agree on GAC advice to
forward to the ICANN Board of Directors.
The GAC can provide advice on any application. For the Board to be able to
consider the GAC advice during the evaluation process, the GAC advice would
have to be submitted by the close of the Objection Filing Period (see Module 1).
GAC Advice may take one of the following forms:
l. The GAC advises ICANN that it is the consensus of the GAC that a particular
application should not proceed. This will create a strong presumption for the
ICANN Board that the application should not be approved.
ll. The GAC advises ICANN that there are concerns about a particular
application "dot-example". The ICANN Board is expected to enter into dialogue
with the GAC to understand the scope of concerns. The ICANN Board is also
expected to provide a rationale for its decision.
lll. The GAC advises ICANN that a particular application should not proceed
unless remediated. This will raise a strong presumption for the Board that the
application should not proceed unless there is a remediation method available
in the Guidebook (such as securing one or more government's approval) that is
implemented by the applicant.
Annex II
Operating Principles Article XII Principle 47
The GAC works on the basis of seeking consensus among its membership.
Consistent with United Nations practice1, consensus is understood to mean the
practice of adopting decisions by general agreement in the absence of any
formal objection. Where consensus is not possible, the Chair shall convey the
full range of views expressed by members to the ICANN Board.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|