<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] draft letter on JAS WG to the Board
- To: "<Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>" <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] draft letter on JAS WG to the Board
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:07:24 +0000
- Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <4EA96DE60200005B0007E28A@smtp.law.unh.edu>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <4EA96DE60200005B0007E28A@smtp.law.unh.edu>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Councillors,
Absent any further comments, this letter will be sent to the Board this morning.
If there are any last-minute objections, please make them now.
Stéphane
Le 27 oct. 2011 à 18:42, <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx> <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx> a
écrit :
>
> Anybody else have comments or care? If not I would urge Stéphane to send ASAP.
>
> Cheers
> Mary
>
> "Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>"
> <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Mary and Wolf for doing this.
>
> I have put this in a word document, and edited mostly with a mind to make the
> letter truly palatable by all groups. My take is that we are doing this to
> send the Board the message that we have not brushed this aside, but not to
> give them political messages about JAS (each group can do that by itself).
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Stéphane
>
> P.S.: Glen, is there GNSO letterhead for this kind of letter?
>
> Le 27 oct. 2011 à 16:23, Thomas Rickert a écrit :
>
>> Well done, Mary and Wolf-Ulrich!
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 27.10.2011 um 15:17 schrieb Mason Cole:
>>
>>> Looks good Mary. Nicely done.
>>>
>>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Sent: Thu 10/27/2011 8:04 AM
>>> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: [council] Fwd: draft letter on JAS WG to the Board
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> Wolf-Ulrich's and my proposed draft is below. Apologies that, due to the
>>> limited functionality of the email program on my tablet, I've not been able
>>> to send just the text cut and pasted into a single email.
>>>
>>> Please let us know if you are fine with the letter. If I may, can I ask
>>> that comments be directed as far as possible to the substance rather than
>>> style (though I'm more than ready to take lessons on that in less time
>>> sensitive communications :-)
>>>
>>> Thanks and cheers
>>> Mary
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: AW: P.S. Re: Draft letter to GAC
>>> From: "<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: Mary Wong <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> CC:
>>>
>>> Mary, as I said I'm ok with the text.
>>>
>>> I would like to ask councillors whether we could give the following hint to
>>> the board regarding the fee reduction:
>>> <<
>>> In particular we are confident that a common view can be achieved on the
>>> fee reduction which we see essential for needy applicants who qualify,
>>> thereby
>>> ensuring benefits from the new gTLD program are open to all parts of the
>>> community.
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Which may be inserted into the 3rd para (see attached)
>>>
>>> See you later
>>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2011 15:53
>>> An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
>>> Betreff: P.S. Re: Draft letter to GAC
>>>
>>> Oops, I meant draft letter to the Board!
>>>
>>> "Mary Wong<mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>" <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Wolf, thanks for volunteering to help out! What do you think of this -
>>>
>>> (From Stéphane as Council chair to Steve Crocker)
>>>
>>> Dear Dr. Crocker,
>>>
>>> I am pleased to send the following note on behalf of the GNSO Council, in
>>> relation to the recommendations contained in the Joint Applicant Support
>>> (JAS) Working Group (WG) Final Report. We understand that the Board has
>>> been working on the issue of how ICANN can demonstrate its commitment to
>>> ensuring fair and non-discriminatory access by and adequate support for
>>> needy applicants in the new gTLD program, and hope that the GNSO community
>>> can be of assistance in this regard.
>>>
>>> The GNSO Council and community which it represents shares the Board's
>>> commitment and fully supports the goals around which the JAS WG was formed.
>>> The Council is extremely grateful to the WG and its volunteers, for the
>>> incredible amount of work and the many substantive recommendations that it
>>> made, including in the Milestone Reports that were published prior to the
>>> Final Report. We accepted all the WG reports and have actively encouraged
>>> each of the GNSO's constituences and stakeholder groups to submit
>>> substantive comments and, where appropriate, level of support for each of
>>> the WG's recommendations.
>>>
>>> We understand that the Registry and Non-Commercial Stakeholder Groups have
>>> each submitted formal comments. We believe that other groups will follow
>>> suit. As the overall issue and specific recommendations are fairly complex,
>>> spanning financial, technical and policy implementation matters, we hope
>>> the Board understands that this is not a topic on which there is a unified
>>> community consensus. We believe that, as each constituency and stakeholder
>>> group's comments are received, it will be possible to see where there is
>>> consensus and/or support, and where there is disagreement.
>>> <<
>>> In particular we are confident that a common view can be achieved on the
>>> fee reduction which we see essential for needy applicants who qualify,
>>> thereby
>>> ensuring benefits from the new gTLD program are open to all parts of the
>>> community.
>>>>>
>>> In addition, we hope that more specific implementation issues and
>>> suggestions may emerge from these comments.
>>>
>>> We are pleased that the Board has demonstrated a continuing and serious
>>> interest in the work of the JAS WG, and wish to inform you that the Council
>>> and GNSO community stands ready to assist the Board in coming to
>>> implementable decisions regarding this very important issue.
>>>
>>> Yours sincerely,
>>> Stéphane Van Gelder
>>> GNSO Council Chair
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________
>> Thomas Rickert, Rechtsanwalt
>> Schollmeyer & Rickert Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft m.b.H. (i.e. law firm)
>> Geschäftsführer / CEO: Torsten Schollmeyer, Thomas Rickert
>> HRB 9262, AG Bonn
>>
>> Büro / Office Bonn:
>> Kaiserplatz 7-9, 53113 Bonn, Germany
>> Phone: +49 (0)228 74 898 - 0
>>
>> Büro / Office Frankfurt a.M.:
>> Savignystraße 43, 60325 Frankfurt, Germany
>> Phone: +49 (0)69 714 021 - 56
>>
>> Zentralfax: +49 (0)228 74 898 - 66
>>
>> mailto: rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> skype-id: trickert
>> web: www.anwaelte.de
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|