<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Topics for meeting with Board?
My view is that it absolutely is a Council issue. Part of our role in
managing policy development is to recommend (through our votes) GNSO policies
to the Board. The current conflicts of interest policy and the lack of an
anti-revolving door policy call into question whether the consideration of the
GNSO policy recommendations may be/have been/are being/could be adversely
affected by the current policy and lack of one, respectively.
I do not care whether the Board members expressed their displeasure or do
again. Candidly, I would think that they'd all welcome the discussion - if
only to dispel the impression that they don't care about this issue and/or
don't consider it important, which is what the transcript of our last meeting
with them could be read to mean.
K
From: Neuman, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 10:04 AM
To: Rosette, Kristina; Stéphane Van Gelder
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] Topics for meeting with Board?
Kristina,
I would like to get everyone's thoughts on that one. In Singapore that issue
did not go over so well and we had a number of board members express their
displeasure at having that discussion. My question to you is whether that
topic is a Council issue or whether that issue is the type of issue that should
be taken up directly with the board by you, your stakeholder group, etc.
The Council is responsible for managing policy work and personally I am not
sure this falls within that purview.
That said, I just gave you my personal view (not that of my stakeholder group
or as vice chair). So if others disagree with me and want to add it to the
list of topics to discuss with the Board, I would be happy to do so.
Thanks.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 9:42 AM
To: Stéphane Van Gelder
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] Topics for meeting with Board?
I'd like to discuss conflicts of interest/anti-revolving door policies.
From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 7:56 AM
To: Rosette, Kristina
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] Topics for meeting with Board?
Thanks for raising the question Kristina. There has been some discussion on
this and I seem to remember that Jeff mentioned it during our last GNSO meeting
as he covered the agenda for Dakar.
As "meeting organizer" for Dakar, Jeff is collating our topics for
Board/ccNSO/GAC.
And the Board has been asking us for topics. So let me bounce off your email to
encourage everyone to submit topics to Jeff or on list if you have not already
done so.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 18 oct. 2011 à 19:03, Rosette, Kristina a écrit :
Greetings!
Just realized that I don't think I've seen any email traffic on topics for our
meeting with the Board. Did I miss it (which is entirely possible)? I'm
perfectly content to wait until this weekend to discuss if we don't have to
provide topics to Board support staff in advance.
Safe travels everyone!
K
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|