<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] For consideration: RAA DIscussion Paper
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] For consideration: RAA DIscussion Paper
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:42:01 -0700
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcyJ1x3sEh2nJRkbQW6P1BJdGYglIgAB/LRg
- Thread-topic: For consideration: RAA DIscussion Paper
Dear Councillors,
For your convenience the Discussion Paper On Next Steps to Produce a New Form
of Registrar Accreditation Agreement (including reference documents)
13 October 2011
is posted on page:
http://gnso.icann.org/issues
and be directly referenced at:
http://gnso.icann.org/issues/final-raa-discussion-paper-13oct11-en.pdf
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://gnso.icann.org
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Kurt Pritz
Sent: jeudi 13 octobre 2011 20:37
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] For consideration: RAA DIscussion Paper
Dear GNSO Council Members,
I would appreciate it if you could please review the attached "Discussion Paper
on Next Steps to Produce a New Form of the RAA". This paper suggests possible
options for consideration by the community to move the RAA amendment process
forward in a cooperative and timely manner.
This paper was prepared in response to a request from the Board to categorize
proposed amendment topics and summarize possible options for next steps.
The recent efforts by the GNSO Council to address some of the law enforcement
recommendations demonstrate progress and are encouraging. There are many other
proposals to be addressed. We believe that this paper can be useful in
identifying additional alternative paths. To be clear, this is not intended to
interrupt current work or advance ICANN Board or staff opinion in the policy
discussions. The paper is meant to be responsive to requests for information.
It is also meant to signal that there will be a high level of staff support to
facilitate the development of RAA amendments and any related policy activities.
Two additional points: You will find that the categorization of topics is not
as straightforward as we all might prefer. As described in the paper, it is
difficult to determine whether a proposal is a policy issue or is within the
picket fence without considering specific amendment language. Finally, the
paper indicates a preference for undertaking substantive discussion now, to
develop specific recommendations for amendments through negotiation or policy
development or both.
We hope that this Discussion Paper will encourage further dialogue in Dakar
with the GNSO Council, the Registrar Stakeholder Group, and the ICANN community
with regard to identifying an acceptable path forward. I am sure this paper is
likely to raise questions also. I think an exchange of questions and answers is
important to realize the full benefit of the thought that went into this - a
writing does not always capture or describe all the ideas generated. Please
direct those questions to Margie Milam, who will share them with the
cross-functional team that worked on this for your consideration.
Best regards,
Kurt
Kurt Pritz
ICANN
4676 Admiralty Way, #330
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|