<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] GNSO Council resolution on the work of the Joint Applicant Support (JAS) Working Group
- To: Steve Crocker <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] GNSO Council resolution on the work of the Joint Applicant Support (JAS) Working Group
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 14:09:41 +0200
- Cc: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx List" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <4E8F76F2.8090809@gih.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <A89CB684-550B-4F20-9CDB-AEF3AACFFF0E@indom.com> <4E8F76F2.8090809@gih.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear Steve,
I am writing to you in your capacity as Chairman of the ICANN Board to inform
you of the resolution passed by the GNSO Council during its September 22
meeting.
The resolution reads:
Whereas:
The GNSO Council and ALAC established the Joint SO/AC Working Group (JASWG) on
support for new gTLD applicants in April of 2010; and
The Joint SO/AC Working Group released its second Milestone Report, posted for
consideration by the Board, Chartering Organizations and at-large Community.
This report documented the completion of work as defined in the extended
charter and,
The Joint SO/AC Working Group received and discussed the public comments, and
The Joint SO/AC Working Group has completed the enumerated items as defined in
its extended charter and has published a final report
(https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/JAS+Issues+and+Recommendations#) on
14 September 2011 covering those chartered items
(http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#20110113-1) entitled Final Report of the
Joint SO/AC new GTLD applicant support working group. And
The Joint SO/AC Working Group is still in the process of completing some last
tasks including completion of the formal documentation of the comment responses
for the second milestone community review, and
The GNSO Council has not had a chance to review the Final Report nor digest any
of its contents,
However, the GNSO Council does not wish to delay implementation of support
programs for applicants from developing regions,
Resolved:
The GNSO Council thanks the members of the Joint SO/AC Working Group for its
efforts and its dedication to completing these work items on such a tight
schedule, and
The GNSO Council approves forwarding the final Report to the ICANN Board for
review, but reserves its right to provide comments to the ICANN Board on all of
the recommendations contained therein; and
The GNSO Council requests ICANN staff to develop an implementation plan
following the JAS WG recommendations, subject to comments received from the
GNSO community , and
The GNSO Council requests that ICANN staff publish the implementation plan for
public comment prior to consideration by the ICANN Board, and
The GNSO Council requests that the Joint SO/AC Working Group complete the
publication of its formal Milestone 2 response document as quickly as possible,
and
The GNSO Council requests that the Joint SO/AC Working Group remains on call to
review the outcome of the ICANN implementation of the JAS recommendations.
Resolved further, that the GNSO Council instructs the GNSO Chair to communicate
its decision to the ALAC Chair.
Would you please inform the Board of this GNSO Council resolution and draw the
Board's attention to its various RESOLVED clauses.
For the Board's convenience, please see the following link to the JAS WG Final
Report: http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/jas-final-report-13sep11-en.pdf
Best,
Stéphane Van Gelder
GNSO Council Chair
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|