<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Our Chair's quote in Managing Internet IP
- To: krosette@xxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [council] Our Chair's quote in Managing Internet IP
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 07:51:56 -0700
- Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hopefully the clarification about my comment will help.
Tim
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [council] Our Chair's quote in Managing Internet IP
> From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, October 03, 2011 9:43 am
> To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> A number of people in my world interpreted the motion and intro text to mean
> it had GAC support.
>
> As for Stephane�s comments, I hope not. Stephane? Unfortunately, however,
> he�s identified in the article as being GNSO Council Chair so people
> reading the article will likely assume that he was speaking for (or with the
> endorsement of) the Council.
> om: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 10:20 AM
> To: Rosette, Kristina
> Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [council] Our Chair's quote in Managing Internet IP
>
> No one ever said the GAC endorsed the RrSG motion. And I doubt highly
> that Stephane presented his comments as the view of the Council.
>
>
> Tim
>
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [council] Our Chair's quote in Managing Internet IP
> > From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
> > Date: Mon, October 03, 2011 8:37 am
> > To: "'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> >
> > "The GNSO's van Gelder concluded that brands must ensure that there is
> > sufficient demand before proceeding with their application.� 'Don't
> > forget the sales channel and the marketing part of the TLD.� You must
> > butter up the registrars,' he said."
> > �
> > I don't believe I got that memo.� Perhaps it got lost along with the memo
> > to the GAC seeking its endorsement of the RrSG motion . . .
> > �
> > �
> > �
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|