ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Our Chair's quote in Managing Internet IP

  • To: krosette@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: [council] Our Chair's quote in Managing Internet IP
  • From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 07:51:56 -0700
  • Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hopefully the clarification about my comment will help.

Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [council] Our Chair's quote in Managing Internet IP
> From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, October 03, 2011 9:43 am
> To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> A number of people in my world interpreted the motion and intro text to mean 
> it had GAC support.
>  
> As for Stephane�s comments, I hope not. Stephane?  Unfortunately, however, 
> he�s identified in the article as being GNSO Council Chair so people 
> reading the article will likely assume that he was speaking for (or with the 
> endorsement of) the Council.
> om: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 10:20 AM
> To: Rosette, Kristina
> Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [council] Our Chair's quote in Managing Internet IP
>  
> No one ever said the GAC endorsed the RrSG motion. And I doubt highly
> that Stephane presented his comments as the view of the Council.
> 
> 
> Tim
> 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [council] Our Chair's quote in Managing Internet IP
> > From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
> > Date: Mon, October 03, 2011 8:37 am
> > To: "'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > "The GNSO's van Gelder concluded that brands must ensure that there is 
> > sufficient demand before proceeding with their application.Ã�  'Don't 
> > forget the sales channel and the marketing part of the TLD.Ã�  You must 
> > butter up the registrars,' he said."
> > Ã� 
> > I don't believe I got that memo.Ã�  Perhaps it got lost along with the memo 
> > to the GAC seeking its endorsement of the RrSG motion . . .
> > Ã� 
> > Ã� 
> > Ã� 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>