<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] A thought on the potential of a "seal program" fornon-binding best practices
- To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "'Adrian Kinderis'" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Marika Konings'" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] A thought on the potential of a "seal program" fornon-binding best practices
- From: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:35:53 +0000
- Cc: "'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <31582FA079F2AC4FBC8BA78B67C32AA7080E108AF9@STNTEXCH01.cis.neustar.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <31582FA079F2AC4FBC8BA78B67C32AA7080E108AF9@STNTEXCH01.cis.neustar.com>
- Reply-to: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sensitivity: Normal
I received it from John via the list.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:23:01
To: 'Adrian Kinderis'<adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
'john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'<john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Marika
Konings'<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: 'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [council] A thought on the potential of a "seal program" for
non-binding best practices
We will be sending out the proposed Dakar agenda shortly for comment, but we
were planning on including this topic.
On a separate note, for some reason I did not get john's e-mail until Adrian
replied. Is this just an issue with my e-mail or did others have the same
problem?
Thanks,
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Vice President, Law and Policy
Neustar, Inc
Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx
P: 571-434-5772
M: 202-549-5079
-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Kinderis [mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 07:53 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Marika Konings
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] A thought on the potential of a "seal program"
for non-binding best practices
Can we add this to the agenda in Dakar please?
The Registrars will have lots to say here J
I appreciate the perspective and applaud JB for his approach.
Adrian Kinderis
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, 29 September 2011 1:18 AM
To: Marika Konings
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] A thought on the potential of a "seal program" for
non-binding best practices
Marika & fellow Coucillors:
While I am totally supportive of working to reach agreement on a shared
definition of "best practices" -- their identification, implementation and
measurement -- there is something in the notion of a "seal of approval" that
most piques my interest.
As a founding member of the Board of TRUSTe (www.truste.com), the online
privacy rights organization that manages a seal program for data collection and
use, I am familiar with the consumer value of such industry self-regulatory
programs can deliver.
In the case of non-binding policies it may be that such an approach -- a seal
granted and monitored by ICANN or a third-party -- can make the implementation
of these policies a matter of competitive advantage for registrars and
registries.
As the non-binding best practices are identified, they can be used as a way to
review business practices and earn (or not) a seal of approval for the applying
party. The seal can them become a part of that company's competitive
marketing. Consumers can then choose to work with a company based on their
commitment to those policies, knowing that a third-party is monitoring
performance.
This could be a way to supplement the consensus policy process, using market
forces help lead to consumer advantage.
Cheers,
Berard
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [council] Discussion Paper on the Creation of Best Practices
to Address the Abusive Registrations of Domain Names
From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, September 28, 2011 3:20 am
To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dear All,
As requested by the GNSO Council, please find attached the discussion
paper on 'the creation of non-binding best practices to help registrars
andregistries address the abusive registrations of domain names' prepared by
ICANN Staff. We would like to suggest that the GNSO Council consider opening a
public comment forum on this document to allow for community input on the
issues outlined in the paper as well as the proposed next steps. Should the
Council agree with this suggestion, a time has been tentatively reserved at the
ICANN meeting in Senegal to organize a workshop on the paper and solicit
community input (scheduled for Wednesday 26 October from 9.00 – 10.30 local
time). We look forward to receiving your feedback.
With best regards,
Marika
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|