Re: [council] Proposed Amendments to JAS Motion

[Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Jeff,

thank you for your comments and amendments, they looks friendly and didn't
hear any objection in the WG.
but I would like to have more explanations and reasons about those
amendments in whereas and resolved parts and their implications on the
report. that will help me to have better understanding.

Best,

Rafik


2011/9/17 Neuman, Jeff <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>

> All,****
>
>
> Please find enclosed proposed Amendments to the JAS motion from the gTLD
> Registries Stakeholder Group.  All of the changes are in red in the word
> document and should not be controversial and I hope will be taken as
> friendly. ****
>
> ** **
>
> First and foremost, we want to recognize the hard work of the JAS Working
> Group and make sure that the work product gets to the ICANN staff and board
> for their consideration without implying that we, the GNSO Council or
> community, necessarily endorse all of the contents therein because of the
> little time we have had to review.  That said, we would like to see the
> ICANN staff begin working on an implementation plan of the recommendations,
> publish that plan out for public comment, and do so in time to  discuss in
> Dakar and launch the new gTLD Application Process in January.  ****
>
> ** **
>
> I hope everyone finds these amendments in the spirit in which they were
> intended – appreciative of the hard work of JAS, supportive of providing
> support to applicants from developing economies and wanting the application
> period to begin on schedule in January.****
>
>
> Thanks.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy*
> 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling, VA 20166
> *Office:** *+1.571.434.5772  *Mobile: *+1.202.549.5079  *Fax: *
> +1.703.738.7965 */* jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx  */* www.neustar.biz ****
> ------------------------------
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
> delete the original message.****
>
> ** **
>