<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Motion to Address the Remaining Registration AbusePolicies Working Group Recommendations
- To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Glen de Saint Gery'" <gnso-secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Glen" <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Motion to Address the Remaining Registration AbusePolicies Working Group Recommendations
- From: "Zahid Jamil" <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:59:23 +0000
- Cc: "'Marika Konings'" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "John Berard" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <31582FA079F2AC4FBC8BA78B67C32AA7080E4798D0@STNTEXCH01.cis.neustar.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAGPKy8XSHjZGrvfrIUh8GPQCgQAAEAAAAFhxaAd74j1IjSPB9jlv6e4BAAAAAA==@dndrc.com><31582FA079F2AC4FBC8BA78B67C32AA7080E4797AD@STNTEXCH01.cis.neustar.com><!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAGPKy8XSHjZGrvfrIUh8GPSisAAAEAAAAMn+2StjU5dHnQdL0HDI12sBAAAAAA==@dndrc.com><!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAGPKy8XSHjZGrvfrIUh8GPSisAAAEAAAABnoNB3xcV9DtT0UeByhJV8BAAAAAA==@dndrc.com><31582FA079F2AC4FBC8BA78B67C32AA7080E4798D0@STNTEXCH01.cis.neustar.com>
- Reply-to: zahid@xxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sensitivity: Normal
Indeed that is why it is a separate resolved for the purposes of being voted on
separately.
The recommendation for Uniformity of Contracts and an Issues Report received
strong support -
'The RAPWG recommends the creation of an Issues Report to evaluate whether a
minimum baseline of registration abuse provisions should be created for all
in-scope ICANN agreements, and if created, how such language would be
structured to address the most common forms of registration abuse'
At the same time there was some Significant Opposition in the form of view B
(Opposed to the recommendation for an Issues Report as expressed in view A).
To approve the request for an Issue Report there would need to be 'an
affirmative vote of more than 25% vote of each House or majority of one House'.
Hope this helps.
Sincerely,
Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
Fax: +92 21 5655026
www.jamilandjamil.com
Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are being
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may
contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and
constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The
reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever
of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by
electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use
of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil &
Jamil is prohibited.
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
-----Original Message-----
From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:39:15
To: Zahid Jamil<zahid@xxxxxxxxx>;
council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Glen de
Saint Gery'<gnso-secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Glen de Saint
Géry'<Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: 'Marika Konings'<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>; 'John
Berard'<john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [council] Motion to Address the Remaining Registration Abuse
Policies Working Group Recommendations
Thanks Zahid, this is great and helps us. Just to point out that respect to
the Uniformity of Contracts recommendation, this was one that although had
strong support, there was significant opposition, correct.
It is important to note that because each of the other recommendations that we
have acted on in one respect or another had unanimous consensus to proceed on.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
From: Zahid Jamil [mailto:zahid@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 11:52 AM
To: Neuman, Jeff; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
'Glen de Saint Gery'; 'Glen de Saint Géry'
Cc: 'Marika Konings'; 'John Berard'
Subject: RE: [council] Motion to Address the Remaining Registration Abuse
Policies Working Group Recommendations
Dear Jeff et al,
Here is a brief explanation with respect to the edits in the motion:
WHOIS Access recommendation #2:
Looking to ensure that compliance reports would be periodic. Staff's (Pam
Little) letter includes this commitment and so has been included.
Fake Renewal Notices recommendation #2:
In order to assist the process of data acquisition and help with what data is
to be collected a small volunteer group suggested (the RAP WG does not exist at
the moment and setting them up would require a Charter etc.)
WHOIS Access recommendation #1:
It wasn't clear in the previous draft who would keep an eye on this. Since the
WHOIS Survey Drafting Team may be looking into similar issue reference to them
added.
Meta Issue: Uniformity of Reporting:
Language included for consistency with RAP WG & IDT report.
Uniformity of Contracts:
Previously was joined into preceding paragraph. Also due to voting threshold
has been included as a separate resolved clause.
Gripe Sites, Deceptive and/or Offensive Domain Names recommendation #2, and;
Cybersquatting recommendation #2:
Language improvement and also to avoid any perception that the Council was
rejecting the work of the WG.
Sincerely,
Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025
Fax: +92 21 35655026
www.jamilandjamil.com<http://www.jamilandjamil.com/>
Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are being
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by
mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the
intellectual property of DNDRC, and constitute privileged information protected
by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment,
modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including
photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not
transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without
prior written permission and consent of DNDRC is prohibited.
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Zahid Jamil
Sent: 15 September 2011 02:41
To: 'Neuman, Jeff'; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
'Glen de Saint Gery'; 'Glen de Saint Géry'
Cc: 'Marika Konings'; 'John Berard'
Subject: [SPAM] RE: [council] Motion to Address the Remaining Registration
Abuse Policies Working Group Recommendations
Dear Jeff,
Thanks.
Please find attached a redline version for everyone's convenience (thanks to
Marika).
As it is late here I will send an explanation for the changes my tomorrow.
Sincerely,
Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025
Fax: +92 21 35655026
www.jamilandjamil.com<http://www.jamilandjamil.com/>
Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are being
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by
mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the
intellectual property of DNDRC, and constitute privileged information protected
by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment,
modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including
photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not
transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without
prior written permission and consent of DNDRC is prohibited.
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: 14 September 2011 22:44
To: Zahid Jamil; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Glen
de Saint Gery'; 'Glen de Saint Géry'
Cc: 'Marika Konings'; 'John Berard'
Subject: RE: [council] Motion to Address the Remaining Registration Abuse
Policies Working Group Recommendations
Zahid,
Can you please explain to the Council what the changes are to this motion from
the last time it was presented (in Singapore) to the Council along with an
explanation for the changes. I see there is something new here on uniformity
of contracts as one example.
Thanks!
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Zahid Jamil
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 6:12 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Glen de Saint
Gery'; 'Glen de Saint Géry'
Cc: 'Marika Konings'; 'John Berard'
Subject: [council] Motion to Address the Remaining Registration Abuse Policies
Working Group Recommendations
Dear Councillors,
Please find below a motion on RAP I am proposing for the next GNSO Council call:
Motion to Address the Remaining Registration Abuse Policies Working Group
Recommendations
Whereas the Registration Abuse Policies (RAP) Working Group submitted its
report to the GNSO Council on 29 May 2010 (see
http://gnso.icann.org/issues/rap/rap-wg-final-report-29may10-en.pdf);
Whereas the GNSO Council reviewed the report and its recommendations and
decided to form an implementation drafting team to draft a proposed approach
with regard to the recommendations contained in the Registration Abuse Policies
Working Group Final Report;
Whereas the Registration Abuse Policies Implementation Drafting Team submitted
its proposed response to the GNSO Council on 15 November 2010 (see
http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/rap-idt-to-gnso-council-15nov10-en.pdf);
Whereas the GNSO Council considered the proposed approached at its Working
Session at the ICANN meeting in Cartagena;
Whereas the GNSO Council acted on a number of RAP recommendations at its
meeting on 3 February 2011 (see http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#201102);
Whereas the GNSO Council requested feedback from ICANN Compliance in relation
to WHOIS Access recommendation #2 and Fake Renewal Notices recommendation #1
and a response was received on 23 February 2011
(http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg10766.html). In
addition, a discussion with Compliance Staff was held at the ICANN meeting in
San Francisco.
Whereas the GNSO Council considered the remaining RAP recommendations in
further detail during its working session at the ICANN meeting in Singapore
based on an overview prepared by ICANN Staff (see
http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/overview-rapwg-recommendations-18may11-en.pdf).
NOW THEREFORE BE IT:
RESOLVED, the GNSO Council thanks the ICANN Compliance Department for its
feedback in relation to WHOIS Access recommendation #2 and determines that no
further work on this recommendation is needed. The GNSO Council welcomes the
commitment of the ICANN Compliance Department 'to report on compliance
activities and publish data about WHOIS accessibility, on at least an annual
basis' (see
(http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg10766.html).
RESOLVED, the GNSO Council thanks the ICANN Compliance Department for its
feedback in relation to Fake Renewal Notices recommendation #1 and determines
that no further work on this recommendation is needed.
RESOLVED, the GNSO Council determines that additional information is needed
from the Registrar Stakeholder Group with regard to the conditional Fake
Renewal Notices recommendation #2 before an Issue Report should be requested of
Staff. The GNSO Council hereby requests that the Registrar Stakeholder Group
provide further information and data on the nature and scope of the issue of
Fake Renewal Notices to help inform the GNSO Council's and its RAP WG
deliberations on whether an Issue Report should be requested. A small group of
volunteers consisting of registrar representatives and others interested
(including former RAP WG members) should be formed to prepare such a request,
work with the Registrar Stakeholder Group to obtain the information requested
and report back to the GNSO Council accordingly.
RESOLVED, in response to WHOIS Access recommendation #1, the GNSO Council
requests the WHOIS Survey Drafting Team to consider including the issue of
WHOIS Access as part of the survey it has been tasked to develop. If the WHOIS
Survey Drafting Team is of the view that it is not appropriate or timely to
include WHOIS Access as part of the survey, it should inform the GNSO Council
accordingly so that the GNSO Council can determine what next steps, if any,
might be appropriate at this stage in relation to this recommendation.
RESOLVED, with regard to the recommendation on Meta Issue: Collection and
Dissemination of Best Practices, the GNSO Council acknowledges receipt of this
recommendation and determines to defer its consideration until it evaluates the
outcome of Malicious Use of Domain Names recommendation #1, which aims to
develop best practices to help registrars and registries address the illicit
use of domain names. In light of the pending request to Staff to develop a
Discussion Paper on the Malicious Use of Domain Names, the GNSO Council
believes that the upcoming review and analysis of this Discussion Paper may
serve to inform the Council of the issues related to the Meta Issue: Collection
and Dissemination of Best Practices recommendation.
RESOLVED, in regard to the recommendations on cross-TLD Registration Scam and
Domain Kiting/Tasting, the GNSO Council Chair shall communicate to the Security
and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) the findings of the RAP WG in this
regard and request that the SSAC consider evaluating and/or monitoring these
abuses. If the SSAC elects to conduct this work, the GNSO Council requests that
the SSAC inform the GNSO Council if it believes that further policy work by the
GNSO Council should be undertaken to address these two types of abuse. In
addition, the GNSO Council suggests that the issue of cross-TLD registration
scam be included in the agenda of its next meeting with the ccNSO Council since
this type of abuse may also affect ccTLDs.
RESOLVED, in response to the recommendation on Meta Issue: Uniformity of
Reporting, the GNSO Council acknowledges receipt of this recommendation, and
hereby requests the ICANN Compliance Department to report on existing systems
to report and track violations and/or complaints; improvements / changes made
since the RAPWG Report or foreseen in the near future, and: identify gaps and
any improvements that might be desirable but not foreseen at this stage.
Further consideration of this Meta Issue, including the recommendations and
considerations of the RAP WG in this regard, is deferred pending receipt of
such information from the ICANN Compliance Department.
RESOLVED, in response to the recommendation on Uniformity of Contracts, the
GNSO Council requests an Issue Report to evaluate whether a minimum baseline of
registration abuse provisions should be created for all in scope ICANN
agreements, and if created, how such language would be structured to address
the most common forms of registration abuse.
RESOLVED, in response to the recommendations on Gripe Sites, Deceptive and/or
Offensive Domain Names recommendation #2, and; Cybersquatting recommendation
#2, since the RAPWG did not achieve consensus on these recommendations, the
GNSO Council defers undertaking further policy work on these recommendations at
this time.
RESOLVED, in response to Gripe Sites; Deceptive and/or Offensive Domain Names
recommendation #1, the GNSO Council acknowledges receipt of this
recommendation, and agrees with the RAPWG that no further action is called for
at this time.
Sincerely,
Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025
Fax: +92 21 35655026
www.jamilandjamil.com<http://www.jamilandjamil.com/>
Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are being
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by
mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the
intellectual property of DNDRC, and constitute privileged information protected
by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment,
modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including
photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not
transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without
prior written permission and consent of DNDRC is prohibited.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|