ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] JAS update and deadline


Councillors,

There were questions, but I've seen no real opposition to us pushing back our 
meeting.

I will therefore plan to push it back from Sept 8 to Sept 22. Once again, if 
anyone is violently opposed please say so. Failing that, I will update the 
agenda on Monday.

Thanks.

Stéphane



Le 19 août 2011 à 18:36, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit :

> Thanks Rafik,
> 
> Councilllors, if a small push back can help the JAS WG meet the 
> Board-requested deadlines, then in my view we should at the very least 
> consider it. But a decision needs to be taken quickly and it needs to be very 
> clearly stated that these are exceptional circumstances and that the Council 
> will not alter it's calendar everytime a WG needs a little extra time.
> 
> In my conversations with the JAS cochairs and the ALAC chair on this, I have 
> been told that pushing back our Sept 8 meeting by 15 days would give the JAS 
> WG the time it needs to present it's final report to us.
> 
> I can, of course, also see reasons for not wanting to push our meeting back. 
> So if anyone is very opposed to doing so, please say so by Wednesday next 
> week so that we can take a timely decision.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> Envoyé de mon iPhone4
> 
> Le 19 août 2011 à 03:38, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> 
>> Dear fellow-councillors,
>> 
>> while the JAS WG members are working hard on drafting the final report with 
>> all difficulties(commitment during summer holidays etc) , I am sending this 
>> email to kindly ask for consideration to push back the gnso confcall planned 
>> for 8th September (or considering special call) and also delaying for few 
>> days the deadline for finalizing the report. a webinar for icann community 
>> is also planned to make it more easy to get a  fast track on the report 
>> updates (knowing that is also another workload for WG members).helping the 
>> discussion among councillors and their respective SG/C regarding the report.
>> 
>> I will be glad to  get your feedback and answer your questions.
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Rafik





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>