ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] JAS update and deadline

  • To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] JAS update and deadline
  • From: Ching Chiao <chiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:46:29 +0800
  • Cc: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=u5anUuYAxRCt/+i2VVJoIWVAxm1FBIh/Pkq5CAovVaw=; b=kBSD9IxdRqmRC1ejbVnFQXJQsUS8APvBs886pQtUedWod6QX/N8df9K7IC44oQB1Sf dUz4M8dQSiYoyP49eS7LzMywNjsJh7zPNyNQnhJR2MgjBmZDWBXt0IOoLgfb72ye4qiT c+J/QzXPV078ol7PbH6M5fJYXcHPj2KLss/9k=
  • In-reply-to: <70F1C242-22C1-420A-AFF7-C2789973B2D4@indom.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <CAH5sThkJhqkquAwKPDxDvsOSYKxA6Rp5wGsN9Fua0Np2AiT3HA@mail.gmail.com> <70F1C242-22C1-420A-AFF7-C2789973B2D4@indom.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thank you Rafik and Stéphane.

Stéphane just to be clear: are we now facing a voting circumstances (moving
meeting time or not)? Personally I am open --  but if we are moving the
regular call to later date then I think we need a good reason -- given ICANN
has already allocated extra staff resource to support JAS work. I very much
agree with Adrian on reviewing the current draft so we can help get
necessary input from our SGs.

Ching

2011/8/20 Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>

>
> Thanks Rafik,
>
> Councilllors, if a small push back can help the JAS WG meet the
> Board-requested deadlines, then in my view we should at the very least
> consider it. But a decision needs to be taken quickly and it needs to be
> very clearly stated that these are exceptional circumstances and that the
> Council will not alter it's calendar everytime a WG needs a little extra
> time.
>
> In my conversations with the JAS cochairs and the ALAC chair on this, I
> have been told that pushing back our Sept 8 meeting by 15 days would give
> the JAS WG the time it needs to present it's final report to us.
>
> I can, of course, also see reasons for not wanting to push our meeting
> back. So if anyone is very opposed to doing so, please say so by Wednesday
> next week so that we can take a timely decision.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stéphane
>
> Envoyé de mon iPhone4
>
> Le 19 août 2011 à 03:38, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> > Dear fellow-councillors,
> >
> > while the JAS WG members are working hard on drafting the final report
> with all difficulties(commitment during summer holidays etc) , I am sending
> this email to kindly ask for consideration to push back the gnso confcall
> planned for 8th September (or considering special call) and also delaying
> for few days the deadline for finalizing the report. a webinar for icann
> community is also planned to make it more easy to get a  fast track on the
> report updates (knowing that is also another workload for WG
> members).helping the discussion among councillors and their respective SG/C
> regarding the report.
> >
> > I will be glad to  get your feedback and answer your questions.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Rafik
>
>


-- 
Ching CHIAO
Vice President, DotAsia Organisation LTD.
Chair, Asia Pacific Networking Group
Member of ICANN GNSO Council & RySG
=====================================
Email: chiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx     Skype: chiao_rw
Mobile: +886-918211372  |  +86-13520187032
www.registry.asia | www.apngcamp.asia
www.facebook.com/ching.chiao


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>