Re: [council] Letter to GAC and ccNSO re Consumer metrics

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Tim.

Do any other SGs, apart from the registrars, have a view on this?

Thanks,

Stéphane



Le 3 août 2011 à 15:00, Tim Ruiz a écrit :

> I have similar concerns. In any event, I would rather we first vote on
> the motion so we know which way we intend to go with it. That way the
> letter can be clear and cause no confusion or misunderstanding.
> 
> 
> Tim
> 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [council] Re: Letter to GAC and ccNSO re Consumer metrics
> > From: StÃ∞©phane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Mon, August 01, 2011 3:43 am
> > To: Rosemary Sinclair <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Hi Rosemary,
> > 
> > Thanks for your request. I am copying the Council on my response
> > because I think this is a discussion we should all be having.
> > 
> > Let me start by saying how much I appreciate your efforts as leader of
> > the GNSO Council's Consumer metrics initiative. I'm sure all Councillors
> > feel the same way.
> > 
> > What I am not sure of, however, is that all would feel comfortable with
> > me sending the letter you have drafted as-is. My understanding is that
> > we as a Council have yet to determine whether we are comfortable with
> > moving this ahead as a cross-community effort.
> > 
> > My own personal view is that the letter as drafted could be
> > misconstrued as a call for cross-community work. I am not saying whether
> > this is a good or bad thing, but as there has been considerable debate
> > on this over the past few months, I would not feel comfortable in
> > sending such a letter in my capacity as Chair unless I know the Council
> > supports that move.
> > 
> > So may I ask for comments on the proposed letter? Is everyone OK with
> > me sending it as-is?
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > Stéphane
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Le 31 juil. 2011 à 00:15, Rosemary Sinclair a écrit :
> > 
> > > Hi Stephane
> > > 
> > > I wonder if you would review this letter for GAC and ccNSO if you are
> > happy to send it as GNSO Council Chair
> > > 
> > > The topic of extended participation in our discussions came up at our
> > audio-conference on Wednesday
> > > 
> > > The group appreciates that the Motion still has to be approved by
> > Council but there is interest in the work continuing on an informal
> > basis in the meantime
> > > 
> > > but a strong view that the concepts are complicated and inter-related
> > 
> > > 
> > > so the more diverse views the better, the earlier the better.....
> > > 
> > > the letter will need Glen's attention to ensure ICANN protocols and
> > details are correct - I am completely out of my depth on all that!!!!
> > > 
> > > cheers
> > > 
> > > Rosemary
> > > ________________________________________
> > > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry [Glen@xxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 8:32 AM
> > > To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [council] Draft Council meeting minutes 21 July 2011.
> > > 
> > > Dear Councillors,
> > > 
> > > Attached please find the draft minutes of the Council meeting held on
> > 21 July 2011.
> > > 
> > > If there are no comments, these minutes will be published on the
> > website as approved on 8 August 2011.
> > > 
> > > Thank you.
> > > 
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Glen
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Glen de Saint Géry
> > > GNSO Secretariat
> > >
> > gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > http://gnso.icann.org
> > > 
> > > 
> > > <Request to GAC:ccNSO.docx>
> > 
> > 
>