ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Re: Letter to GAC and ccNSO re Consumer metrics

  • To: Rosemary Sinclair <rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Re: Letter to GAC and ccNSO re Consumer metrics
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 10:43:07 +0200
  • Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <F579FEEE5CDE224AB3333CF24F4F6FC22EA2DD4361@INFPWEC000.ad.unsw.edu.au>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <F579FEEE5CDE224AB3333CF24F4F6FC22EA2DD4361@INFPWEC000.ad.unsw.edu.au>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi Rosemary,

Thanks for your request. I am copying the Council on my response because I 
think this is a discussion we should all be having.

Let me start by saying how much I appreciate your efforts as leader of the GNSO 
Council's Consumer metrics initiative. I'm sure all Councillors feel the same 
way.

What I am not sure of, however, is that all would feel comfortable with me 
sending the letter you have drafted as-is. My understanding is that we as a 
Council have yet to determine whether we are comfortable with moving this ahead 
as a cross-community effort.

My own personal view is that the letter as drafted could be misconstrued as a 
call for cross-community work. I am not saying whether this is a good or bad 
thing, but as there has been considerable debate on this over the past few 
months, I would not feel comfortable in sending such a letter in my capacity as 
Chair unless I know the Council supports that move.

So may I ask for comments on the proposed letter? Is everyone OK with me 
sending it as-is?

Thanks.

Stéphane

Attachment: Request to GAC:ccNSO.docx
Description: Microsoft Office

Le 31 juil. 2011 à 00:15, Rosemary Sinclair a écrit :

> Hi Stephane
> 
> I wonder if you would review this letter for GAC and ccNSO if you are happy 
> to send it as GNSO Council Chair
> 
> The topic of extended participation in our discussions came up at our 
> audio-conference on Wednesday
> 
> The group appreciates that the Motion still has to be approved by Council but 
> there is interest in the work continuing on an informal basis in the meantime
> 
> but a strong view that the concepts are complicated and inter-related 
> 
> so the more diverse views the better, the earlier the better.....
> 
> the letter will need Glen's attention to ensure ICANN protocols and details 
> are correct - I am completely out of my depth on all that!!!!
> 
> cheers
> 
> Rosemary
> ________________________________________
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
> Of Glen de Saint Géry [Glen@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 8:32 AM
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [council] Draft  Council meeting minutes  21 July 2011.
> 
> Dear Councillors,
> 
> Attached please find the draft minutes of the Council meeting held on 21 July 
> 2011.
> 
> If there are no comments, these minutes will be published on the website as  
> approved on 8 August 2011.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Glen
> 
> 
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat
> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> http://gnso.icann.org
> 
> 
> <Request to GAC:ccNSO.docx>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>