<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] RE: Question Regarding Procedure for Responding to Board Request Re: Red Cross/Olympic Names
- To: "'Margie Milam'" <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] RE: Question Regarding Procedure for Responding to Board Request Re: Red Cross/Olympic Names
- From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:06:42 -0400
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- In-reply-to: <5792758163D76C4F9C36491EDF2AF7351275DD2AFA@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <5792758163D76C4F9C36491EDF2AF7351275DD2AFA@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcxHzjGqqJeqj2JzQHKuYrhAJaekNgAApooA
- Thread-topic: Question Regarding Procedure for Responding to Board Request Re: Red Cross/Olympic Names
I think another question we had was whether the motion referred only to
protections at the top-level in future rounds or whether it is asking for
protections at the second level in this upcoming round. I now some people
provided their beliefs on the call today, but I am not so sure I agree.
Nonetheless, we should get clarity.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Margie Milam
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 1:58 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] Question Regarding Procedure for Responding to Board Request
Re: Red Cross/Olympic Names
Dear All,
Just wanted to let you know that Staff will provide an answer to the question
posed on today's Council call (concerning whether a PDP is required to provide
policy advice to the Board on the Red Cross/Olympic Names issue) by mid-next
week.
All the best,
Margie
______
Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
______
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|