<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Remote Participation for Senegal
- To: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Remote Participation for Senegal
- From: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:20:36 +0200
- Cc: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB572FA8E9FE@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <20110720102413.4a871ae7d05d2c98d9abb595d392cd69.be36774f9a.wbe@mobilemail.secureserver.net> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB572FA8E9FE@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Adrian
Do you mean "to not be able" or "to not prefer"?
Just wondering how high the special barrier some folks face is…
Thanks
Bill
On Jul 21, 2011, at 1:06 PM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:
> This makes me mad.
>
> I am not mad at Tim, far from it.
>
> But why ICANN continually chooses places that forces key stakeholders and
> contributors to not be able to participate to the fullest.
>
> Crazy.
>
> Here’s an idea. Let’s build a remote site and EVERYONE go there...
>
> LA Marriott anyone?
>
> Adrian Kinderis
>
>
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: Thursday, 21 July 2011 3:24 AM
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [council] Remote Participation for Senegal
>
> Glen,
>
> Can you provide an update of on the expected availability of remote
> participation for Senegal?
>
> Also to all, if there is any movement toward a US or EU remote
> participation base, I would be up for that and doing what I could to
> help cover costs. I think John was asking about this earlier. Any
> interests?
>
> Either way, after further consideration I think I may be attending only
> remotely.
>
>
> Tim
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|