ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] JIG

  • To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] JIG
  • From: Ching Chiao <chiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:03:42 +0800
  • Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@xxxxxxxxx>, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, Lesley Cowley <lesley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Edmon Chung <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cXxzTqncCmlu3v+jwym84XTdiiynGH800xZItYPuVGg=; b=vf6AC0Fv1JxqIrbUc+U4LtVI5DSH0FvRxymzALNY+gYDuoKcAS9LWbs24zw742OgRH 36lhQVID57CDmhEhVKM+L3miqSHOkGWTS5fvzxJjR3QksY+P3aKOJhLqNDeXPcywotzP D7HKO1RIThNNytjyttdRSiDxr4qO4UBtnCvyw=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=rTUng+9WD+br7G18nsl0nJdR1KgGyWeH/uNwBfZZJEEzQTpYRjV9nuIU18pIM/lO5r VWNJ3uCDaW9F25hOS38+7AYmxJnmejUTOBkZK0FaTp79EUKj9fEwFsuoGS1Ce45y4Wz3 sw/KBdj0yL4QpK4HvxR7/1/gxF4LqIV0HPN2s=
  • In-reply-to: <71C5B985-4935-4BF8-8419-6C22F8B7983A@indom.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <71C5B985-4935-4BF8-8419-6C22F8B7983A@indom.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks Stéphane for ensuring this important work continues. I support the
arrangement.

For your last paragraph, I'd like to emphasize it's because of the need to
continue the work, not the "show flat" part (which of course is an great
by-product deriving from the process).

Ching


On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder <
stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Councillors,
>
> One of the action items we might want to take away from our meeting with
> the ccNSO today is a possible extension of the JIG's charter.
>
> As discussed, the current charter has the group stopping its work once the
> DAG is finalized, which today's Board decision has effectively done.
>
> But there are some issues the JIG would still like to address (IDN
> variants, universal acceptance of IDNs...).
>
> The JIG is meeting today. Leslie Cowley, Chair of the ccNSO, and I had a
> quick talk with some JIG members after our joint meeting today and we asked
> that the group get back to both Councils telling us what issues they would
> like to look at and what timeframe they feel they need to do that.
>
> Once we get that feedback, the suggestion that we would put to both
> Councils would then be to extend the JIG's charter accordingly.
>
> The message we got from the JIG is that they feel the group is a great
> example of a CWG that works well and with balanced participation from both
> chartering organisations. So it may be a group that we want to look to as a
> kind of "show flat" for the way CWGs could work well, and hence we may want
> to extend their charter as requested.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stéphane
>



-- 
Ching CHIAO
Vice President, DotAsia Organisation LTD.
Chair, Asia Pacific Networking Group
Member of ICANN GNSO Council & RySG
=====================================
Email: chiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx     Skype: chiao_rw
Mobile: +886-918211372  |  +86-13520187032
www.registry.asia | www.apngcamp.asia
www.facebook.com/ching.chiao
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>