<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] GNSO-ccNSO meeting
- To: "Stéphane Van Gelder" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "GNSO Council List" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] GNSO-ccNSO meeting
- From: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 09:18:20 +0000
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <B19AACDE-F7AA-4E32-8FEA-FE508715048F@indom.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7F8508D34A1@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org><B19AACDE-F7AA-4E32-8FEA-FE508715048F@indom.com>
- Reply-to: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sensitivity: Normal
Also we might at least remind them that we will need to consider extension of
the JIG WG as they would like to still address both the variant issue and
universal acceptance of IDN.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 09:40:03
To: GNSO Council List<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] GNSO-ccNSO meeting
Councillors,
As discussed today, please find attached the proposed agenda for our meeting
with the ccNSO.
Absent any further comments this afternoon, and as time is short on this, Glen
please send this agenda to the ccNSO secretariat and Chair on my behalf this
evening.
Thanks,
Stéphane
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|