<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Topics for our discussions with the Board
- To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Topics for our discussions with the Board
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 09:07:21 +0200
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Councillors,
Following on from our discussions today, please find below a refined list of
topics.
Please come back with comments and proposed edits asap. As a reminder, our
session with the Board is today from 17:30 to 19:00.
Thanks,
Stéphane
AoC
i) The AoC process & outputs to date, and the broader progress of transparency
& accountability across the range of ICANN processes.
ii) The AoC's repeatedly stated requirement that ICANN act in the public
interest. While there've been some preliminary discussions on such matters,
the AoC is now almost 2 years old. Are we able to have a more probing and
structured discussion with the benefit of this experience?
CWG
The GNSO Council has spent a lot of time recently discussing Community Working
Groups (CWGs), to the point that we have a drafting team looking at this topic.
Recent experiences with a couple of CWGs that the GNSO is involved in have
shown that it would be useful to have a better-defined process for them.
GNSO/Board interact.
At the Board's initiative, our interaction with the Board seems to be changing.
The Council's always found our social interaction with the Board, more
specifically the dinners we used to have with the Board, to be extremely useful.
Revolving door.
In light of the DNS becoming a function more visible to, and scrutinized by
governments and business on a global basis, and the size of the market about to
be created by the new gTLD program, has the Board begun to assess how this
might require changes to ICANN ethics policies, e.g., the introduction of an
anti revolving door policy?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|