ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] NTIA letter to ICANN

  • To: "Adrian Kinderis" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council List" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] NTIA letter to ICANN
  • From: <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 05:56:36 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB56F87C1FDA@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <4DFACC0E0200005B00072785@mail.law.unh.edu> <459B0E9D-61FB-43BA-AEA0-6F972EC7054E@indom.com> <4DFAE9ED0200005B00072800@mail.law.unh.edu> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB56F87C1FDA@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I agree we won't be in a position to respond at the moment, and
certainly not in the next week, but my thought was: (1) given that we'd
had a WG looking at the issue which reached no consensus, the Council as
managers could (should?) at least start a discussion as to whether or
not to re-open the issue within the GNSO community; and (2) in view of
its potential implications for the new gTLD program, if we do decide to
start discussing it, it might be useful to do so ahead of the special
Board meeting on Monday.
 
Cheers
Mary

 
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH
03301USAEmail: mary.wong@xxxxxxx.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage:
http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on
the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> 


From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:"Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx" <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>, GNSO Council List
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 6/17/2011 5:49 AM
Subject: RE: [council] NTIA letter to ICANN

I am not sure to what end?
Why would we discuss this?
Haven’t we already got a full agenda? Why is this particular letter so
important. I am not convinced the GNSO Council is in a position to
respond nor assist here...

Adrian Kinderis



 

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, 17 June 2011 5:45 PM
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: Re: [council] NTIA letter to ICANN

 

Despite the unfortunate timing (16 June) I think this is an important
development and support discussing it on Saturday. We may need to have a
follow up discussion, but it would be good to have at least an initial
conversation as soon as possible.


Cheers

Mary

 

Mary W S Wong

Professor of Law

Chair, Graduate IP Programs

Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH
03301USAEmail: mary.wong@xxxxxxx.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage:
http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on
the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>> 



From: 
Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>

To:
GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: 
6/17/2011 5:40 AM

Subject: 
[council] NTIA letter to ICANN

Councillors, 

 

For those of you that haven't seen this, here is a link to the letter
NTIA has sent to ICANN re the new gTLD program.

 


http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/strickling-to-dengate-thrush-16jun11-en.pdf

 

This is one of the topics that we could discuss during our Saturday
morning session, if there is interest in doing so.

 

Stéphane

 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>