Re: [council] PEDNR Final Report

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

I will defer to your judgment on this of course.

Let me know if you want me to send a message to the Council explaining the 
situation, or if it would perhaps be better to leave the motion on the agenda, 
for discussion purposes only?

Stéphane



Le 14 juin 2011 à 17:38, Alan Greenberg a écrit :

> Stéphane, I would suggest that we not rush this through.
> 
> Although I had seen and agreed to the draft motion yesterday, I now realize 
> that there are some problems with it. Since The GNSO Council cannot take any 
> formal action on this report at this meeting (we did not meet the publication 
> deadline for such action), the motion was only being presented as a heads up 
> and a chance for informal discussion.
> 
> A suggestion was made on the PEDNR list to consider the motion carefully, and 
> as Chair (well, Acting Chair since it was never made official), I think that 
> would be wise. We have spent too much time on this PDP to rush on the last 
> part.
> 
> Alan
> 
> At 14/06/2011 08:38 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
>> Thanks Marika.
>> 
>> Tim is the Council liaison for this group, but in the interest of making our 
>> motion deadlines, I would like to make the attached motion.
>> 
>> If Tim is not already traveling and can get on line later on today, he may 
>> wish to make the motion himself, in which case I will defer to him.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Stéphane
>