RE: [council] Motion for IRTP-B Final Report and Recommendations

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Just a reminder that I did not make a motion. I submitted text of a
draft motion to start discussion of the report.


Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [council] Motion for IRTP-B Final Report and
> Recommendations
> From: "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, June 08, 2011 10:21 am
> To: "'Tim Ruiz'" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'GNSO Council'"
> <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I understand that it may not be practical to vote on this tomorrow.
> 
> However, it is sitting without a second and so I am happy to second it.
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: 01 June 2011 22:13
> To: GNSO Council
> Subject: [council] Motion for IRTP-B Final Report and Recommendations
> 
> A proposed motion for the final report and recommendations of the IRTP-B WG 
> is attached in both doc and txt formats.
> 
> Thanks to Marika for putting this together. I made a few edits because my 
> personal opinion is that recommendations 8 and 9 are not fully baked yet. 
> While I have faith in Staff's ability to do what is asked of it in those two 
> recommendations, I do not feel it is appropriate. There are policy aspects of 
> those two recommendations that are yet unaddressed.
> Using an implementation plan to flesh them out is not appropriate or fair to 
> either the community or to Staff.
> 
> As Liaison to this WG I should have caught that sooner, but I am not sure the 
> WG would have gotten any further with them either way. As a result I have 
> left them mentioned in Resolve(D) but have not yet had time to ocnsider how 
> to frame them. 
> 
> In any event, the Council has not had opportunity to discuss the report so 
> voting on this motion during the meeting on the 9th is not practical.
> The moton is being presented here to get it on the agenda for discussion 
> purposes only. I do believe we could be able to vote on it as early as 
> Singapore.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim
> 
> 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
> database 6172 (20110601) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com