<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] ICANN Final Status Report to the GNSO Council on AGP Limits Policy Implementation
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] ICANN Final Status Report to the GNSO Council on AGP Limits Policy Implementation
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:32:20 -0700
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcwiNbhQUyzFaDzmRTiydzUkYAbVZA==
- Thread-topic: ICANN Final Status Report to the GNSO Council on AGP Limits Policy Implementation
http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-02jun11-en.htm
ICANN Final Status Report to the GNSO Council on AGP Limits Policy
Implementation
2 June 2011
ICANN today is posting its fifth and final status
report<http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/agp-limits-policy-final-report-02jun11-en.pdf>
[PDF, 316 KB] to the GNSO on the implementation of its recommendations for the
Add Grace Period (AGP) Limits Policy. As noted in prior status reports, the
success of the Policy is evidenced by the 99.7% reduction in AGP deletes since
the Policy went into effect in April 2009.
ICANN committed to analyzing and reporting on the effects of the Policy to the
GNSO at six-month intervals for two years after its implementation. The first
status
report<http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/agp-limits-policy-report-10jun09-en.pdf>
[PDF, 41 KB] was issued on 10 June 2009, the second status
report<http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/agp-limits-policy-report-14dec09-en.pdf>
[PDF, 61 KB] on 14 December 2009, the third status
report<http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/agp-limits-policy-report-01jun10-en.pdf>
[PDF, 224 KB] on 1 June 2010, and the fourth status
report<http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/agp-limits-policy-report-18nov10-en.pdf>
[PDF, 312 KB] on 18 November 2010. The purpose of these reports has been "to
allow the GNSO to determine when, if ever, these recommendations and any
ensuing policy require additional clarification or attention based on the
results of the reports prepared by ICANN Staff." Presented in a prior report
was that during GNSO calls in April and May 2010, following inquiry from ICANN
Staff about whether or not additional Policy work should be considered, the
GNSO decided that the success of the Policy and the low number of exemption
requests demonstrated that modifications to the Policy were not warranted at
that time. Further, since the time of those calls there have not been any
additional GSNO discussions about the Policy and the number and frequency of
reported exemption requests from registrars has dropped considerably.
The results of the AGP Limits Policy illustrate the success of ICANN's
consensus-driven, bottom-up policy development process. Community members
identified the problem, initiated policy discussions, generated a solution, and
now monitor the results. The ICANN practice of encouraging and considering
broad community input on policy issues leads to effective results.
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|