<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Fwd: [gnso-chairs] One character IDN report
Thanks Ching,
I am sure Edmon reads our list and is aware of this.
As mentioned in my previous email, I do not plan on sending a formal notice of
this to the JIG unless asked to by the Board.
Stéphane
Le 28 mai 2011 à 02:51, Ching Chiao a écrit :
> Hi Stéphane,
>
> I'd agree your approach, and keep in mind that JIG includes representatives
> from SSAC as well.
>
> I think the nature of this statement is more techno-policy and implementation
> related. I'd suggest if you can simply contact Edmon who chairs the JIG and
> let him know about such "friendly" reminder from the Staff. I am assuming the
> Staff needs only input from SSAC to close the loop so for the time being the
> Council should be less involved. However if any action needs to be taken at
> the Council level in the near future, Edmon would provide useful responses
> for Council to consider as we have informed him to be prepared.
>
> Let me know if it works. Thank you and have a good weekend.
>
> Best,
>
> Ching
>
> p.s. I think what's being working / communicating gives a more clear picture
> of CWG --
> a. GNSO / ccNSO / ASO can form joint group at direction of Board.
> b. Joint group work on charters that the charter needs to be approved by
> participating SO.
> c. Experts from the community can be invited to participate the joint group.
> d. Group report, once approved by participating SO, can be sent to Board for
> consideration.
> e. While Board reviews the report, they can always contact Advisory groups
> (GAC / RSAC / SSAC / ALAC) for official and final recommendation.
>
>
>
> 2011/5/28 Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> Councillors,
>
> Please see the email from Liz below. The reason I did not resend this email
> to the Council list immediately is that since receiving it, I have been in
> conversation with Staff trying to understand what exactly is being asked
> here, and of whom?
>
> As you will see, the note is addressed to SSAC. However, I am told
> unofficially that there is an intent that the GNSO and ccNSO ask the JIG to
> look at this as well.
>
> Given the current uncertainties and imprecisions around CWGs, I am not
> willing to pass this on to the JIG directly without an official request from
> the Board to do so.
>
> Please let me have your thoughts if you feel this is not the way to handle
> this issue.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stéphane
>
>
>
> Début du message réexpédié :
>
>> De : Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date : 26 mai 2011 02:18:51 HAEC
>> À : "gnso-chairs@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-chairs@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc : Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Objet : [gnso-chairs] One character IDN report
>>
>> Hi Stéphane and all,
>>
>> The Board has asked for additional information regarding the JIG report and
>> the attached informal note has been sent to the SSAC by Kurt Pritz. In
>> addition, the GNSO Council (and ccNSO) may wish to forward these questions
>> to the JIG for additional clarification from that group. Also, I understand
>> that there may be more questions that arise as the report is further
>> analysed.
>>
>> Thanks, Liz
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ching CHIAO
> Vice President, DotAsia Organisation LTD.
> Chair, Asia Pacific Networking Group
> Member of ICANN GNSO Council & RySG
> =====================================
> Email: chiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Skype: chiao_rw
> Mobile: +886-918211372 | +86-13520187032
> www.registry.asia | www.apngcamp.asia
> www.facebook.com/ching.chiao
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|