RE: [council] Re: Monday conflict joint ccNSO/GNSO Council and DNS Abuse Forum

["Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>]

+1 

It's also frustrating for those in the community that would like to attend both 
meetings.  

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 3:31 AM
To: Gabriella Schittek; Margie Milam; Glen de Saint Géry
Cc: Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx> <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx; Jeff Neuman; David Olive; 
GNSO Council
Subject: [council] Re: Monday conflict joint ccNSO/GNSO Council and DNS Abuse 
Forum


Thanks Glen, Margie and Gaby.

These potential clashes are becoming more and more frequent and as we've seen 
from discussions over the past few days, less and less consideration is being 
given to official GNSO Council meetings.

In my view, it should be understood that Councillors will tend to prioritize 
official Council business instead of side meetings. This means that in this 
instance, whatever is put up against our lunch with the ccNSO, Councillors 
should NOT be expected by the side-meeting organisers.

Of course this is the official line I would like the Council to take but there 
will always be exceptions. That is understood and I am not saying that 
Councillors must attend all Council meetings whatever the circumstances.

However, I am no longer OK with the tacit assumption that seems to exist at 
meeting planning time that putting something opposite a GNSO Council item is 
fine, and drawing Councillors away from our official business is also fine.

Not only is that assumption detrimental to Council business, not only does it 
make those people working on our own agenda (Mary and Glen this time around) 
have to work twice as hard to accommodate these schedule clashes that seem to 
come out of nowhere, but it also sends a signal to the wider community that 
Council business is not important.

I am copying the Council as I would like to push for further discussions on 
this.

Thanks,

Stéphane



Le 24 mai 2011 à 21:24, Gabriella Schittek a écrit :

> Hi,
> 
> I believe so, but let me check this with Lesley & co - I'll come back to you 
> as soon as possible!
> 
> Gabi
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Glen de Saint Géry
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 12:01 PM
> To: Margie Milam; Gabriella Schittek; Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx; 
> stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Gisella Gruber-White
> Subject: RE: Monday conflict joint ccNSO/GNSO Council and DNS Abuse Forum
> 
> Thanks would the joint ccNSO/GNSO be acceptable against the IDN Variant 
> meetings?
> 
> 
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat
> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://gnso.icann.org
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Margie Milam
> Sent: mardi 24 mai 2011 20:50
> To: Glen de Saint Géry; Gabriella Schittek; Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx; 
> stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Gisella Gruber-White
> Subject: RE: Monday conflict joint ccNSO/GNSO Council and DNS Abuse Forum
> 
> Is that the only choice?  It seems as though the Forum will draw  some of the 
> counselors/ccNSO reps, but if that's the only time on Monday,  I guess we'll 
> have to live with it.
> Margie
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen de Saint Géry
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 12:48 PM
> To: Margie Milam; Gabriella Schittek; Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx; 
> stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Gisella Gruber-White
> Subject: Monday conflict joint ccNSO/GNSO Council and DNS Abuse Forum
> 
> Dear Gabi, Margie, Mary and Stephane,
> 
> We are currently working on the schedule with the meeting team and there is 
> currently a conflict on Monday: 12:30 -14:00 we have the joint ccNSO/GNSO 
> lunch and the DNS Abuse Forum is being planned for 13:00 - 14:30. Could you 
> live with this?
> 
> Thanks.
> Glen
> 
> 
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat
> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://gnso.icann.org
> 
>