<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: : [council] Fwd: Follow-up to the second JAS WG report
- To: HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx, stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx, KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx, william.drake@xxxxxx
- Subject: Re: : [council] Fwd: Follow-up to the second JAS WG report
- From: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 14:29:40 +0000
- Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Importance: Normal
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sensitivity: Normal
If that is our duty we will have little time for anything else. We could likely
argue for weeks about the inaccuracy of some of the NCSG comments in blogs,
etc. about contracted parties. Fortunately, our charge is fairly simple, manage
the policy process. Let's just stick to that, please.
Tim
------Original Message------
From: HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx
To: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
To: william.drake@xxxxxx
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: : [council] Fwd: Follow-up to the second JAS WG report
Sent: May 23, 2011 9:17 AM
Mary,
I agree and support your sentiments.
Debbie
Debra Y. Hughes l Senior Counsel American Red Cross
Office of the General Counsel 2025 E Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20006 Phone:
(202) 303-5356 Fax: (202) 303-0143 HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 10:04 AM To:
stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx; KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; william.drake@xxxxxx Cc:
council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re:: [council] Fwd: Follow-up to the second JAS
WG report
As I'd indicated on the Council call, I believe it's our duty to correct
factual misrepresentations that we know have taken place by/within the GNSO
community. As such, I support sending the letter as Stephane now has it (i.e.
including Bill's language).
I note also that neither this version nor my earlier attempts to achieve a
similar result are "NCSG positions" as such, although I believe a number of
other NCSG Councilors share my view.
As Jeff points out, we are not in a position to alter what ALAC/At Large did as
part of their process. We are, however, obliged not to permit continued
misperceptions about what happened to circulate amongst our community.
Cheers
Mary
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW Two White Street Concord, NH 03301
USA Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx Phone: 1-603-513-5143 Webpage:
http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php Selected writings available on the
Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584 >>>
From:
<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:
<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, <william.drake@xxxxxx>
CC:
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
5/23/2011 9:10 AM
Subject:
AW: AW: [council] Fwd: Follow-up to the second JAS WG report
Thanks both, Bill and Stéphane. I think this is acceptable.
Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich
Von: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] Gesendet:
Montag, 23. Mai 2011 14:27 An: William
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|