Re: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report

[<Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Tim - would it help if we added the word "GNSO" to the "chartering
process" language, to say "GNSO-chartered process"?
 
Jeff - I understand your point, which is somewhat different from the
point I was trying to make in the note. In other words, I thought it
would be useful for the Board to know that the group itself - as opposed
to At Large staff - via Rafik and Carlton, whose cover note made it
clear, that stuck to the GNSO chartered process.
 
Cheers
Mary

 
 
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH
03301USAEmail: mary.wong@xxxxxxx.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage:
http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on
the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> 


From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:"'tim@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
"'stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx'" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>,
"'owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 5/17/2011 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant
Support Second Milestone Report
I also would like to see the statement about the "scrupulous observance
of the chartering process" removed. We still need to find out why the
at-large icann staff sent the report to the board on May 9th as is
indicated in Olivier's note. I am also not convinced that one
organization sending the report to the board without the approval of the
other organization is in line with the chartering process, but we can
discuss that further. 
Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq. 
Vice President, Law & Policy 
NeuStar, Inc. 
Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx 


 
From: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 08:12 AM
To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>;
owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Council
GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Subject: Re: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant
Support Second Milestone Report 
 
No objection if you remove the last sentence. There is no chartering
process for CWGs. The ALAC and GNSO could not even agree on what the
charter should be. And at least a few of us have concerns about how and
why CWGs are being formed.


Tim
From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx> 
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 10:45:21 +0200
To: Council GNSO<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant
Support Second Milestone Report

Councillors,

Please find below the NCSG's suggestion on a message which I could send
to the Chairman of the Board in my capacity as Chair of the GNSO.

Thanks Mary for providing this draft.

Please let me have your comments.


Stéphane




Le 14 mai 2011 à 16:31, <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx> <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
a écrit :



Hi - sorry for the delay in getting back to you on the Council letter;
there has been some lively discussion among some NCSG folks about it.
 
We suggest the following draft:
 
Dear Peter,
 
We understand that ALAC has forwarded to the Board the Joint SO/AC New
gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)'s Second Milestone Report.
As the other chartering organization of the JAS WG, the GNSO Council
notes that it has not yet approved the Report. We acknowledge the
Board's desire to move forward with new gTLDs, including issues relating
to applicant support, and hope to provide the Board with our advice and
recommendations as soon as possible. 
The GNSO Council would also like to inform the Board that it
appreciates the JAS WG's scrupulous observance of the chartering
process, in submitting its Report simultaneously to ALAC and the GNSO
for review. 
 
I would be grateful if you could convey the GNSO Council's message to
the Board.
 
Best regards,
Stephane van Gelder
Cheers
Mary

 
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH
03301USAEmail: mary.wong@xxxxxxx.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage:
http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on
the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> 


From: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
To:Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>, Council GNSO
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 5/14/2011 5:18 AM
Subject: [council] Re: Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant
Support Second Milestone Report
Thanks Olivier. 

GNSO Council, FYI.

A good weekend to all.

Stéphane




Le 14 mai 2011 à 11:03, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond a écrit :



Dear Stéphane,

please find enclosed, a copy of our follow-up message to the Board
including ALAC comments.
Please don't hesitate to get in touch if you have any query about its
contents.
Have a good week-end!
Kind regards,

Olivier

-------- Message original -------- 
Sujet:Statement of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second
Milestone Report

Date :Fri, 13 May 2011 20:26:34 -0700
De :ICANN At-Large Staff <staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (
mailto:staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx )
Pour :Secretary <secretary@xxxxxxxxx> ( mailto:secretary@xxxxxxxxx )
Copie à :ocl@xxxxxxx <ocl@xxxxxxx> ( mailto:ocl@xxxxxxx ),
carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx> (
mailto:carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx ), rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx
<rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx> ( mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx ), ICANN
At-Large Staff<staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ( mailto:staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
)


Dear all,  

The At-Large staff has the honor of transmitting to you, on behalf of
the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC):
The Second Milestone Report of the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant
Support Working Group ( JAS WG), with a revised ALAC introduction
(entitled “Status of this Document”); and The Statement of the ALAC on
the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report.  

We request that these documents (attached here) be forwarded to the
members of the ICANN Board.   

The Second Milestone Report was received by the ALAC and the Generic
Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) on 7 May 2011.  Then, the At-Large
staff, on behalf of the ALAC, initially forwarded this Report to the
Board on 9 May 2011.  Please note that the Report itself has not been
substantively changed since the Board initially received it on 9 May.

During the period 7–13 May, comments on the Report were collected from
the At-Large Community.  These comments are the basis for the Statement
of the ALAC on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report
attached here.

The ALAC ratification process for the Second Milestone Report and the
ALAC Statement will begin on 14 May, and the results will be forwarded
to the Board.
           
Please note that GNSO approval of this document is being conducted
independently and has not reached the approval stage. 


Regards,
Heidi Ullrich, Seth Greene, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber-White, and
Marilyn Vernon
ICANN At-Large Staff

email: staff[at]atlarge.icann.org
website: www.atlarge.icann.org


 
<jas-milestone2-report-7may11-en-alac-revision.pdf><AL-ALAC-ST-0511-2
ALAC Statement on the Joint Applicant Support Second Milestone Report -
EN.pdf>