<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
AW: Fwd: [council] Re: Second Milestone Report of the JAS CWG
- To: <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: AW: Fwd: [council] Re: Second Milestone Report of the JAS CWG
- From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 09:50:22 +0200
- Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <201105162025.p4GKPgMi005002@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <201105162025.p4GKPgMi005002@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcwUGRNZzHZE+FpMSqOZRs0pa89qgQATaWeA
- Thread-topic: Fwd: [council] Re: Second Milestone Report of the JAS CWG
Thanks Eric,
I'll forward it to the council list since there'll be a discussion about the
JAS report Thursday this week.
Kind regards
Wolf-Ulrich
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Eric Brunner-Williams [mailto:ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet: Montag, 16. Mai 2011 22:26
An: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
Betreff: Re: Fwd: [council] Re: Second Milestone Report of the JAS CWG
> below you find the question from Wolf-Ulrich.
...
> 3.2 Financial need: How is the contribution of 45,000 $ calculated?
> Is this just 25% of the regular application fee?
No, and yes. It is the figure ICANN used in 2000 and 2004, and it is also
a quarter of the current application fee.
Assuming the Board approves some reduction in fee (and 50% is just such
a presumption), then if the applicants are capable of meeting 50% of that
cost, before external support, then the applicants need to be capble of
self-funding at the 2000-2004 level.
Ultimately, what fee reduction the Board directs, and what external cost
support exists, are controlling.
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|