ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

AW: Fwd: [council] Re: Second Milestone Report of the JAS CWG

  • To: <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: AW: Fwd: [council] Re: Second Milestone Report of the JAS CWG
  • From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 09:50:22 +0200
  • Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <201105162025.p4GKPgMi005002@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <201105162025.p4GKPgMi005002@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcwUGRNZzHZE+FpMSqOZRs0pa89qgQATaWeA
  • Thread-topic: Fwd: [council] Re: Second Milestone Report of the JAS CWG

Thanks Eric,

I'll forward it to the council list since there'll be a discussion about the 
JAS report Thursday this week. 


Kind regards
Wolf-Ulrich 


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Eric Brunner-Williams [mailto:ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Gesendet: Montag, 16. Mai 2011 22:26
An: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
Betreff: Re: Fwd: [council] Re: Second Milestone Report of the JAS CWG

> below you find the question from Wolf-Ulrich.
...
> 3.2 Financial need: How is the contribution of 45,000 $ calculated?
> Is this just 25% of the regular application fee?
 
No, and yes. It is the figure ICANN used in 2000 and 2004, and it is also
a quarter of the current application fee.

Assuming the Board approves some reduction in fee (and 50% is just such
a presumption), then if the applicants are capable of meeting 50% of that
cost, before external support, then the applicants need to be capble of
self-funding at the 2000-2004 level.

Ultimately, what fee reduction the Board directs, and what external cost
support exists, are controlling.

Eric




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>