ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] JAS motion

  • To: "'stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx'" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, "'rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx'" <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] JAS motion
  • From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 08:26:54 -0400
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • Cc: "'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'glen@xxxxxxxxx'" <glen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <2888580E-5372-4E93-8543-1EF44697A38B@indom.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcwP1mNujwfaoHnwRzqL0Brl5BVgvAAAFMGf
  • Thread-topic: [council] JAS motion

I am actually a little confused by the motion. It talks about putting this out 
for community review, but at the same time forwarding it to the Bd for approval 
AND for the staff to begin implementation.

shouldn't the motion stop at putting it out for community review?
Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
Vice President, Law & Policy
NeuStar, Inc.
Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx



From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 08:22 AM
To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] JAS motion

Thanks Rafik.

Is there a second for this motion?

Stéphane



Le 11 mai 2011 à 13:16, Rafik Dammak a écrit :

Hello,

I would like to submit this motion regarding the JAS milestone report.

Regards
Rafik


Whereas:

The GNSO council and ALAC established the Joint SO/AC Working Group (JASWG) on 
support for new gTLD applicants in April of 2010; and

The Working Group released it  Milestone Report posted for consideration by the 
Board, Chartering Organizations and at-large Community. This report documented 
the completion of work as defined in the orignal charter and requested an 
update to the Working Groups charter, and

The GNSO and ALAC, separately, renewed the Working Groups charter with 
additional work item in February 2011, and

The Joint SO/AC Working Group received and discussed the public comments, and

The Joint SO/AC Working Group has completed the work as defined in its extended 
charter and published a second milestone report 
(https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/JAS+Issues+and+Recommendations#) on 
8 May 2011 covering those chartered items 
(http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#20110113-1) entitled JAS Milestone Report. 
and

The GNSO council does not wish to delay the start of the new gTLD application 
process, and

The GNSO council does not wish to delay implementation of support programs for 
applicants from developing regions,

Resolved:

The GNSO Council thanks the members of the Joint SO/AC Working Group for its 
efforts and its dedication to completing the work on such a tight schedule, and

The GNSO Council request that the report be put out for community review as 
soon as possible,

The GNSO Council approves forwarding the  second JAS Milestone Report  to the 
ICANN board for review and approval, and

The GNSO Council request ICANN staff begin working on implementation of the 
recommendation pending Board approval, and

The JAS Working Group continues working to deal with any issues that may arise 
in the upcoming review by the community, the  Board and from the Staff in the 
process of implementing the proposals, and

That the JAS Working group publish their final report after this review process.

Resolved further, that the GNSO Council instructs the GNSO Chair to communicate 
its decision to the ALAC Chair.




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>