<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] JAS motion
- To: "'stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx'" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, "'rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx'" <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] JAS motion
- From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 08:26:54 -0400
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Cc: "'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'glen@xxxxxxxxx'" <glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <2888580E-5372-4E93-8543-1EF44697A38B@indom.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcwP1mNujwfaoHnwRzqL0Brl5BVgvAAAFMGf
- Thread-topic: [council] JAS motion
I am actually a little confused by the motion. It talks about putting this out
for community review, but at the same time forwarding it to the Bd for approval
AND for the staff to begin implementation.
shouldn't the motion stop at putting it out for community review?
Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
Vice President, Law & Policy
NeuStar, Inc.
Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx
From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 08:22 AM
To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] JAS motion
Thanks Rafik.
Is there a second for this motion?
Stéphane
Le 11 mai 2011 à 13:16, Rafik Dammak a écrit :
Hello,
I would like to submit this motion regarding the JAS milestone report.
Regards
Rafik
Whereas:
The GNSO council and ALAC established the Joint SO/AC Working Group (JASWG) on
support for new gTLD applicants in April of 2010; and
The Working Group released it Milestone Report posted for consideration by the
Board, Chartering Organizations and at-large Community. This report documented
the completion of work as defined in the orignal charter and requested an
update to the Working Groups charter, and
The GNSO and ALAC, separately, renewed the Working Groups charter with
additional work item in February 2011, and
The Joint SO/AC Working Group received and discussed the public comments, and
The Joint SO/AC Working Group has completed the work as defined in its extended
charter and published a second milestone report
(https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/JAS+Issues+and+Recommendations#) on
8 May 2011 covering those chartered items
(http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#20110113-1) entitled JAS Milestone Report.
and
The GNSO council does not wish to delay the start of the new gTLD application
process, and
The GNSO council does not wish to delay implementation of support programs for
applicants from developing regions,
Resolved:
The GNSO Council thanks the members of the Joint SO/AC Working Group for its
efforts and its dedication to completing the work on such a tight schedule, and
The GNSO Council request that the report be put out for community review as
soon as possible,
The GNSO Council approves forwarding the second JAS Milestone Report to the
ICANN board for review and approval, and
The GNSO Council request ICANN staff begin working on implementation of the
recommendation pending Board approval, and
The JAS Working Group continues working to deal with any issues that may arise
in the upcoming review by the community, the Board and from the Staff in the
process of implementing the proposals, and
That the JAS Working group publish their final report after this review process.
Resolved further, that the GNSO Council instructs the GNSO Chair to communicate
its decision to the ALAC Chair.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|