<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
AW: [council] Draft message to the Board
- To: <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: AW: [council] Draft message to the Board
- From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 12:58:25 +0200
- In-reply-to: <779E4503-2EA4-46AC-AE0F-4C71BA2BA24F@indom.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <779E4503-2EA4-46AC-AE0F-4C71BA2BA24F@indom.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcwPSvBLhZ2PPzuoTBOcZm7F19rEUAAffS9g
- Thread-topic: [council] Draft message to the Board
I understand the major concern with the process that ALAC (staff) did provide
the report to the board is - and that's my concern as well - that the board may
be mislead in assuming they could act upon.
Since this is not the case our message should clearly point it out by saying:
"This report - not yet approved by both chartering organizations (ALAC and
GNSO) - is for information only and not intended to initiate any board action."
I think such or a similar statement should be supported by ALAC, too.
Kind regards
Wolf-Ulrich
________________________________
Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Im Auftrag von Stéphane Van Gelder
Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2011 21:44
An: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO
Betreff: [council] Draft message to the Board
Councillors,
In response to Adrian's suggestion, which so far has met with unanimous
support, I have drafted this short email to the Board. Please let me have your
thoughts and any suggested edits. Rafik, as JAS WG co-chair and Council
liaison, I think it is crucial that we have your input before sending any
message to the Board.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Dear Peter,
On May 10, the Board was sent the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant
Support Working Group ( JAS WG)'s Second Milestone Report by ALAC. We
understand that this report has not yet been approved by ALAC.
The GNSO Council wishes to highlight the fact that it has not approved
this report yet either. In fact, the Council has only just received it. The
report was sent to us by the co-chairs of the JAS working group on May 9, 2011.
As one of the two chartering organisations of the JAS WG, the GNSO is
keen to ensure that the Board understands the nature of the report that it has
been sent, and the circumstances under which it received it.
I would be grateful therefore, if you could convey the GNSO Council's
message to the Board.
Best,
Stéphane Van Gelder
GNSO Council Chair
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|