RE: [council] Fwd: Second Milestone Report by the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Completely agree with Adrian and Kristina.  I still want to ask how (or why) is 
it that the ALAC had a chance for a complete review before we even got a draft?

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 1:06 PM
To: 'Adrian Kinderis'; Stéphane Van Gelder; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO
Subject: RE: [council] Fwd: Second Milestone Report by the Joint SO/AC New gTLD 
Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)

+1 with Adrian and I'd also note that, as far as I know, the GNSO Council 
didn't get the report until the 8th.

________________________________
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Adrian Kinderis
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 12:57 PM
To: Stéphane Van Gelder; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO
Subject: RE: [council] Fwd: Second Milestone Report by the Joint SO/AC New gTLD 
Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)
I find the text a little misleading.

I do not think it states strongly enough that the GNSO has not reviewed nor 
does it have a current position on the Board.

Stephane - can you email the Board directly and let them know, separately, the 
GNSO's understanding and status with this report?

Thanks.

Adrian Kinderis

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Tuesday, 10 May 2011 2:13 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO
Subject: [council] Fwd: Second Milestone Report by the Joint SO/AC New gTLD 
Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG)

Councillors,

Please find below the message sent by ALAC to the Board.

Stéphane



Début du message réexpédié :

De : Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx<mailto:ocl@xxxxxxx>>
Date : 10 mai 2011 10:57:20 HAEC
À : Stéphane Van Gelder 
<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc : Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx<mailto:ocl@xxxxxxx>>
Objet : Réexp : Second Milestone Report by the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant 
Support Working Group (JAS WG)

Dear Stéphane,

please be so kind to receive a copy of the finalised JAS Second Milestone 
Report, as transmitted by the ALAC to the Board.
As mentioned in the staff intro, another message from the ALAC will be sent to 
the Board after the expiry of the ALAC comment period at the end of the week. 
This will include an erratum to fix small errors/inconsistencies pointed out by 
our membership. I shall also forward of copy of that follow-up message to you.
Kind regards,

Olivier

-------- Message original --------
Sujet:

Second Milestone Report by the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working 
Group (JAS WG)

Date :

Mon, 9 May 2011 18:27:43 -0700

De :

ICANN At-Large Staff <staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Pour :

Secretary <secretary@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:secretary@xxxxxxxxx>

Copie à :

ocl@xxxxxxx<mailto:ocl@xxxxxxx> <ocl@xxxxxxx><mailto:ocl@xxxxxxx>, 
carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx> 
<carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx>, 
rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx> 
<rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>, ICANN At-Large 
Staff<staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Dear all,

The At-Large staff has the honor of transmitting to you, on behalf of the 
At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC), the Second Milestone Report by the Joint 
SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group ( JAS WG) (attached).  We 
request that this Report be forwarded to the members of the ICANN Board.

The main objective of the JAS WG is to develop a sustainable approach in 
providing support to applicants requiring assistance in applying for and 
operating new gTLDs Registries.

This Report was received by the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) and Generic 
Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) on 6 May 2011 and is currently undergoing 
evaluation. Comments from the At-Large Community are now being gathered until 
13 May 2011 and will be transmitted to the Board in a separate document.  The 
ALAC ratification process will follow, the results of which will also be sent 
to the Board.

Please note that GNSO approval of this document is being conducted 
independently and has not reached the approval stage.

Regards,
Heidi Ullrich, Seth Greene, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber-White, and Marilyn 
Vernon
ICANN At-Large Staff

email: staff[at]atlarge.icann.org
website: www.atlarge.icann.org<http://www.atlarge.icann.org>