<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Re: JAS matters
- To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Re: JAS matters
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 20:07:53 +0200
- Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <4DC5CE64.9000202@gih.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <4DC44451.1000009@gih.com> <BFE51827-CC14-44B7-BA22-68F07949E9D7@indom.com> <4DC5CE64.9000202@gih.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks Olivier.
Stéphane
Envoyé de mon iPhone4
Le 8 mai 2011 à 00:57, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx> a écrit :
> Dear Stéphane,
>
> I understand that the ALAC will include in its introduction a mention
> about the ratification status wrt the ALAC only.
> I will suggest to the ALAC that a sentence explicitly mentions that the
> GNSO approval process is independent and has not reached approval stage.
> Kind regards,
>
> Olivier
>
>
> Le 07/05/2011 20:32, Stéphane Van Gelder a écrit :
>> Councillors,
>>
>> Please see below some additional explanations by Olivier on the way ALAC
>> plans to proceed with this.
>>
>> Olivier, please acknowledge the GNSO's request that the report either be
>> sent to the Board after we have had a chance to approve it, or failing that,
>> that the report bear the caveat that the GNSO has not approved it yet.
>> Please also let us know what ALAC thinks of this request and whether you
>> feel you can accommodate it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Stéphane
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 6 mai 2011 à 20:56, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond a écrit :
>>
>>> Dear Stéphane,
>>>
>>> further to our telephone conversation, let me confirm the timetable that
>>> the ALAC is expected to follow with regards to the Joint Applicant
>>> Support (JAS).
>>>
>>> The ALAC expects that this week-end, it will receive a copy of the JAS
>>> group report, which it understands will be a "Second Milestone Report"
>>> rather than a "Final Report".
>>> That report will be put on-line for At-Large members to comment on,
>>> until May 9th, 22:59 UTC, the date at which the ALAC will take the
>>> comments into consideration. With comments included, it is expected that
>>> the report will be sent to the Board on that day, with a 5 day ALAC
>>> ratification vote taking place soon after. This is standard ALAC procedure.
>>> The May 9th deadline was given to the ALAC by policy Staff as the latest
>>> date material has to be received, for the Board to be able to consider
>>> it in their Retreat on the 20-21st May.
>>>
>>> I trust that this sheds some light on "what happens next".
>>>
>>> Warm regards,
>>>
>>> Olivier Crepin-Leblond
>>> ALAC Chair
>>
>
> --
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|